RESUSCITATION WITH 21% OR 100% OXYGEN IS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE IN RESTORING PERFUSION AND OXYGEN METABOLISM IN THE LIVER OF HYPOXIC NEWBORN PIGLETS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The differential effects of the use of high or low oxygen levels during resuscitation on the neonatal liver are unknown. We compared the hepatic hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism in hypoxic newborn piglets resuscitated with 21% or 100% oxygen. Twenty-seven piglets (age, 1-3 days; weight, 1.5-2.0 kg) were acutely instrumented to measure cardiac output, hepatic artery, and portal venous blood flows (hepatic artery flow index [HAFI] and portal venous flow index [PVFI], respectively). The animals underwent 2 h of hypoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen, 0.10-0.15), then reoxygenation with 21% (n = 9) or 100% (n = 9) oxygen for 1 h, then 1 h with 21% oxygen. The controls (n = 9) were sham-operated without hypoxia-reoxygenation. Oxygen transport and plasma lactate concentrations were studied. Hypoxic animals had hypotension and decreased cardiac index with metabolic acidosis (mean pH, 7.00-7.02; P < 0.05 vs. controls). The PVFI and the total hepatic blood flow (THFI = PVFI + HAFI), despite the absence of significant change in HAFI, decreased to 16 +/- 2 mL/min/kg and 19 +/- 3 mL/min/kg, respectively (versus 24 +/- 2 mL/min/kg and 28 +/- 2 mL/min/kg of controls; P < 0.05). Fifteen minutes after reoxygenation, the cardiac index improved, PVFI recovered, HAFI was maintained, and THFI was not different between the groups. The hepatic oxygen consumption decreased (59%; P < 0.05) and the extraction increased (89%; P < 0.001) during hypoxia. Similarly, on reoxygenation, the hepatic oxygen consumption improved; however, extraction decreased versus controls on 100% but not on 21% oxygen (P < 0.05). The plasma lactate concentrations increased in both groups with hypoxia and were not different during reoxygenation between the group administered with 21% oxygen and the group administered with 100% oxygen. The hypoxic neonatal liver has reduced hepatic blood flow but has relatively preserved HAFI, and oxygen consumption recovered similarly on reoxygenation with 21% and 100% oxygen. The increased oxygen extraction during hypoxia normalized in 21% but reduced in 100% reoxygenation, with no differences in plasma lactate concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".