MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physics at the $$e^+ e^-$$ e + e - linear collider

2015· review· en· W2148311865 on OpenAlexaff
Gudrid Moortgat‐Pick, Howard Baer, M. Battaglia, G. Bélanger, H. Fujii, J. Kalinowski, S. Heinemeyer, Y. Kiyo, Keith A. Olive, F. Simon, P. Uwer, D. Wackeroth, P.M. Zerwas, Masaki Asano, Jonathan Bagger, P. Bechtle, Aoife Bharucha, J. E. Brau, Felix Brümmer, Seong Youl Choi, Ansgar Denner, K. Desch, S. Dittmaier, Ulrich Ellwanger, Christoph Englert, A. Freitas, I. F. Ginzburg, Stephen Godfrey, Nicolas Greiner, Christophe Grojean, M. Grünewald, Jan Heisig, A. Höcker, Shinya Kanemura, K. Kawagoe, R. Kogler, M. Krawczyk, Andreas S. Kronfeld, J. Kroseberg, Stefan Liebler, Jenny List, F. Mahmoudi, Yann Mambrini, Shigeki Matsumoto, J. Mnich, K. Mönig, Margarete Mühlleitner, R. Pöschl, W. Porod, Stefano Porto, Krzysztof Rolbiecki, M. Schmitt, Pasquale Dario Serpico, M. M. Stanitzki, Oscar Stål, Tim Stefaniak, Dominik Stöckinger, G. Weiglein, G. Wilson, Lisa Zeune, F. Moortgat, S. Xella, J. Ellis, S. Komamiya, Michael E. Peskin, D. Schlatter, A. Wagner, H. Yamamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityTRIUMF
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsPhysicsHiggs bosonParticle physicsElectroweak interactionPhysics beyond the Standard ModelSupersymmetryLarge Hadron ColliderAstroparticle physicsColliderStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Gauge bosonTop quarkNuclear physicsGauge (firearms)Gauge theoryNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics. The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons. The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207