MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148314425 · doi:10.1021/jp806689j

FTIR Analysis of Dimethyl Ether Decomposition Products Following Charge Transfer Ionization with Ar<sup>+</sup> under Matrix Isolation Conditions

2008· article· en· W2148314425 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew G. K. Thompson, J. Mark Parnis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDimethyl etherFragmentation (computing)IonizationElectron ionizationEtherMatrix isolationPhotochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical ionizationArgonInfraredIonMethanolOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis has been performed on argon matrices formed following electron bombardment of argon/dimethyl ether mixtures. Products consistent with the ionization and subsequent fragmentation of dimethyl ether cation have been observed. Following ionization of dimethyl ether, fragmentation occurs that is consistent with ionization energy greater than 15 eV due to efficient charge transfer from dimethyl ether to Ar(+) as the major ionization process. Major products observed in the infrared spectra are methane, formaldehyde, HCO(*), CO, and Ar(2)H(+). These products are consistent with the known fragmentation of photoionized dimethyl ether in a 15-16 eV ionization energy range. However, the observation of dehydrogenated products is consistent with additional abstraction of hydrogen from proximally located species isolated within the matrix. Analogous experiments employing CD(3)OCH(3) give similar results, and the observed isotopically substituted products are consistent with the proposed fragmentation pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207