MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148387284 · doi:10.1109/itherm.2010.5501378

The effect of orientation on U-shaped grooved and sintered wick heat pipes

2010· article· en· W2148387284 on OpenAlexafffund
M.K. Russel, Chin-Huai Young, James S. Cotton, C.Y. Ching

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsHeat pipeMaterials scienceGroove (engineering)ChipsetHeat spreaderMicro-loop heat pipeThermal resistanceThermalHeat sinkLoop heat pipeComposite materialOrientation (vector space)MechanicsHeat transferThermodynamicsMetallurgyGeometryPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal management system for a compact sealed computer is studied here. The system consists of two heat spreaders that are connected by two U-shaped heat pipes. The heat pipes are used to transport the heat directly from the chipset to the finned case wall where it is dissipated to the ambient by natural convection. In this study, the effect of orientation on the performance of the U shaped heat pipe was determined. Temperature difference and thermal resistance were measured for a range of heat load values ranging from 0 W to 45 W per heat pipe. Heat pipes with an eccentric sintered wick structure and with an axial groove wick structure were tested. The orientation was found to have a significant effect on the axial groove wick heat pipe performance with a much smaller effect on the sintered wick heat pipe performance. The experimental results were in good agreement with that predicted from the basic governing equations of heat pipes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207