MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148394594 · doi:10.1177/1077546307087487

Interlaced Backstepping and Integrator Forwarding for Nonlinear Control of an Electrohydraulic Active Suspension

2008· article· en· W2148394594 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Kaddissi, Maarouf Saad, Jean‐Pierre Kenné

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingControl theory (sociology)IntegratorActive suspensionLyapunov functionSuspension (topology)Control engineeringComputer scienceNonlinear systemDouble integratorFeed forwardNonlinear controlActuatorEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsAdaptive controlArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passengers' comfort in long road trips is of crucial importance1 as a result, active suspension control became a vital subject in recent researches. This paper studies the control of an electrohydraulic active suspension, based on a combination of backstepping and integrator forwarding. Our goal is to control and reduce the car's vertical motion and keep it to zero. The active suspension model is highly nonlinear and nondifferentiable due to the hydraulic components, especially the servovalve and the hydraulic actuator whose chambers' volume varies during extension and retraction. Therefore, a powerful control strategy is required. In such cases, Lyapunov-based control strategies are the most suitable for offering a lot of maneuverability in building an analytical control signal. The mathematical model of an electrohydraulic active suspension can be classified among interlaced systems. This means that the state space model is a sequence of feedback and feedforward equations. Therefore, interlaced backstepping and integrator forwarding is an optimal control strategy to stabilize this class of systems, particularly electrohydraulic active suspension. Afterwards, we will introduce and define this constructive control method and its basis. The foremost advantage of this interlaced strategy is that, unlike others, it leaves no internal dynamic. This is a great relief in control issues, because an unstable internal dynamic will destabilize the whole system whatever control method is being used. As will be demonstrated, the interlaced backstepping and integrator forwarding is an outstanding control strategy to compensate the effect of chaotic roads on the stability of cars. The results are compared with a classic Proportional-Integral-Derivative regulator and a sliding mode controller, to show that the proposed controller outperforms a range of existing controllers for a range of perturbation signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207