MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148420498 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v3n4p47

Response of Melon Cultivars to Natural Infection by Diseases in South Western Nigeria

2011· article· en· W2148420498 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
I. A. Kehinde

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarDowny mildewMelonFusarium wiltBiologyIncidence (geometry)BlightCropAgronomyHorticultureVeterinary medicineFusarium oxysporumMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Melon is an important crop in South western, Nigeria. The study evaluated incidence and severity of Anthracnose, mildews, wilt, leaf spot and blight disease of melon cultivars: Serewe, Bara A, Bara B in cultivated plots in South Western Nigeria. Experiment was set in a randomized complete block design with five replicates in the Teaching and Research field of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Disease incidence and severity was varied among the melon cultivars. Predominant foliar diseases were Anthracnose and leaf blight with maximum disease incidence index of 82.0–100% across the cultivars. Disease incidence and severity indices for all diseases were high during the early season (27.0-100%) and low during the dry season (19.0-65.0%) except for the downy mildew disease. Fusarium wilt disease incidence was significantly lower than all other diseases encountered. Cultivars were not consistent in their reaction to the diseases and these also varied with the years. The study has given information on the predominant diseases for which control management technology should be developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicPlant Disease Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207