Mesenchymal transition in kidney collecting duct epithelial cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Progressive organ damage due to tissue scarring and fibrosis is a paradigm shared by numerous human diseases including chronic kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to confirm the hypothesis that collecting duct (CD) epithelial cells can undergo mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro. The mechanism by which CDs undergo EMT is complex and involves both early and late cellular events. Early events include rapid insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-induced Akt and GSK-3beta phosphorylation, associated with early disruption of E-cadherin-beta-catenin membrane colocalization, with translocation of E-cadherin to endosomes, with translocation of beta-catenin to the nucleus, and with an increase in Snail expression. Transforming growth factor-beta1, on the other hand, induced early activation of Smad3 and its translocation to the nucleus, Erk1/2 phosphorylation, and early disruption of membrane E-cadherin localization. The late consequences of these events included a phenotypic transformation of the cells to a mesenchymal morphology with associated increase in vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin protein expression and a decrease in total cellular E-cadherin expression, detectable as early as 24 h after stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".