MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148504118 · doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00164-7

Timing of steroid treatment is important for cerebral protection during cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest: minimal protection of pump prime methylprednisolone

2003· article· en· W2148504118 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Shum‐Tim

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncotic pressureCardiopulmonary bypassMedicineMethylprednisoloneAnesthesiaDeep hypothermic circulatory arrestTrypan blueCirculatory systemInternal medicineCerebral perfusion pressureCerebral blood flowChemistryAlbuminApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The contact of cardiopulmonary bypass surface and patient's blood activates systemic inflammatory response which aggravates ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study evaluates the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) on cerebral protection using different steroid administration protocols. METHODS: Eighteen (n=6/group) 4 week-old piglets were divided in three groups. Methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) was administered intravenously 4 h prior to CPB in Group I, or added in pump prime in group II. Group III received no steroid. All animals were cooled to 15 degrees C followed by 100 min of DHCA, then rewarmed over 40 min and sacrificed 6 h after CPB. Post-operative weight gain, bioelectrical impedance, colloid oncotic pressure (COP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated. Determination of cerebral trypan blue and immunohistochemical assays of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and caspase-3 activities were performed. RESULTS: Post-operative % weight gain (13.0+/-3.8 (I) versus 26.4+/-9.9 (II) versus 22.6+/-6.4 (III), P=0.02); % bioimpedance reduction (14.5+/-8.0 (I) versus 38.3+/-13.3 (II) versus 30.5+/-8.0 (III), P=0.003); mean COP (mmHg) (14.9+/-1.8 (I) versus 10.9+/-2.0 (II) versus 6.5+/-1.8 (III), P=0.0001) and systemic IL-6 levels (pg/ml) (208.2+/-353.0 (I) versus 1562.1+/-1111.4 (II) versus 1712.3+/-533.2 (III), P=0.01) were significantly different between the groups. Spectrophotometric analysis of cerebral trypan blue (ng/g dry weight) was significantly different between the groups (0.0053+/-0.0010 (I) versus 0.0096+/-0.0026 (II) versus 0.0090+/-0.0019 (III), P=0.004). TGF-beta1 scores were 3.3+/-0.8 (I) versus 1.5+/-0.8 (II) versus 1.5+/-0.5 (III), P<0.05, groups I versus II and I versus III. Remarkable perivascular caspase-3 activity was observed in groups II and III. CONCLUSION: Different timing of steroid administration results in different inflammatory mediator response. Steroid in CPB prime is not significantly better than no steroid treatment, while systemic steroid pre-treatment significantly decreases systemic manifestation of inflammatory response and brain damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207