Fracture evolution in oil-producing sills of the Rio Grande Valley, northern Neuquén Basin, Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Oil-producing sills are commonly considered atypical reservoirs, although they can hold significant exploration potential. The need for a better understanding of fracture properties and petroleum system characteristics for this and similar igneous rock plays is the main motivation of our study. We explore the evolution of this play type by an analysis of the Los Cavaos oil field, located in the Malargue fold belt of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina, integrating multiscale fracture data from outcrops and subsurface. The field was created by a combination of intrusions and mild Miocene-Pliocene inversion. Production stems from thick cavity zones in naturally fractured andesitic sills emplaced in Upper Jurassic shale source rocks. Orientation patterns, fracture spacing, and length of fracture sets in the sill are consistent over several orders of magnitude. Large multiply connected and weakly cemented fractures are responsible for excellent interconnectedness in the reservoir. Fracture density is correlated with fault proximity, indicating a cogenetic evolution during active deformation. Abundant fractures in core with strike-slip to oblique striations support transpressional overprint during and after fracture formation. Although it is challenging to separate cooling from tectonic fractures, we propose two phases of fracturing, marked by a coexistence of subvertical and oblique fractures together with transpressional striae. Petrographic evidence suggests initial local oil expulsion and migration through microfractures, with opening displacements of 0.01 to 1 mm, followed by subsequent charging of the evolving intrasill cavity system as well as the bulk fracture system during cooling and mild deformation. We suggest that the observed patterns may be extrapolated to sills in similar geotectonic settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".