Anatomical and Functional Enhancements of the Insula after Loss of Large Primary Somatosensory Fibers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brain changes associated with the loss of a sensory modality such as vision and audition have previously been reported. Here, we examined the effect of loss of discriminative touch and proprioception on cortical thickness and functional connectivity. We performed structural magnetic resonance imaging and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans on a 60-year-old female who at age 31 suffered a selective loss of large-diameter myelinated primary afferents and, therefore, relies mainly on her intact thin-fiber senses (temperature, pain, itch, and C-fiber touch) and vision to negotiate her environment. The patient showed widespread cortical thinning compared with 12 age-matched female controls. In contrast, her right anterior insula was significantly thick. Seed-based resting-state analysis revealed that her right anterior insula had increased connectivity to bilateral posterior insula. A separate independent component analysis revealed the increased connectivity between the insula and visual cortex in the patient. As the insula is an important processing area for temperature and C-fiber tactile information, the increased intrainsular and insular-visual functional connectivity could be related to the patient's use of C-fiber (gentle) touch and temperature information in conjunction with visual information to navigate her environment. We, thus, demonstrated plasticity in networks involving the insular cortex following denervation of large-diameter somatosensory afferents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".