Antifreeze proteins are secreted by winter rye cells in suspension culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During cold‐acclimation, winter rye (Secale cereale L) leaves secrete antifreeze proteins (AFPs) into the apoplast. The AFPs bind to ice and modify its growth, which is easily observed in vitro. However, it is not yet known whether in planta AFPs interact with ice or whether they exert cryoprotective effects. These experiments are difficult to conduct with intact plants, so the aim of this work was to determine whether AFPs are produced in response to cold temperature in cell culture and to examine their function by using suspension cells. We showed that suspension cells secreted three of the six known winter rye AFPs into the culture medium during acclimation at 4°C. These AFPs were not present in washed suspension cells, thus indicating that they are not firmly bound to the cell walls. In order to examine the function of extracellular AFPs, non‐acclimated (NA) winter rye suspension cells and protoplasts isolated from NA winter rye leaves were then frozen and thawed in the presence of AFPs extracted from cold‐acclimated winter rye leaves. The AFPs had no effect on the survival of NA protoplasts after freezing; however, they lowered the lethal temperature at which 50% of the cells are killed by freezing (LT50) of NA suspension cells by 2.5°C. We conclude that low above‐zero temperatures induce winter rye suspension cells to secrete AFPs free in solution where they can protect intact suspension cells, but not protoplasts, from freezing injury, presumably by interacting with extracellular ice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".