MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148666468

Behavioral profile of Hypericum perforatum (St. John's Wort) extract. A comparison with standard antidepressants in animal models of depression.

2013· article· en· W2148666468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ishfaq A. Bukhari, A Dar

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypericum perforatumBehavioural despair testAntidepressantAnimal models of depressionPharmacologyImipramineYohimbineVenlafaxineFluoxetineMedicineCitalopramSerotonin reuptake inhibitorSerotoninInternal medicineReceptorAntagonist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hypericum (H.) perforatum, popularly called St. John's Wort has been used traditionally for the treatment of anxiety, depression and as a nerve tonic. Large amount of clinical and animal experimental data demonstrate that H. perforatum acts by biochemical mechanisms similar to the tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, its efficacy in comparison to standard antidepressant drugs is not well studied. The present study evaluated H. perfortum extract in animal models of depression compared to clinically used antidepressants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of standardized extract of H. perforatum was compared with standard antidepressants using animal models of depression such as forced swim test (FST), yohimbine induced lethality test, pnetylenetetrazole (PTZ) induced convulsion and locomotor activity tests. Different doses of the plant extract and standard drugs were administered to rats or mice intraperitoneally (i.p). RESULTS: In the FST, H. perforatum extract (30-90 mg/kg i.p.) caused a dose dependent reduction in immobility time in rats with maximal effect being 53% at 90 mg/kg. This effect was reversed at higher doses (100 mg/kg) showing a U-shaped dose response curve. Fluoxetine and imipramine (30-70 mg/kg i.p.) produced similar reduction in the immobility time in rats. Venlafaxine exhibited weak antidepressant effect. H. perforatum extract (30-100 mg/kg i.p.), dothiepin (10-50 mg/kg i.p.), fluoxetine (30-60 mg/kg i.p.) and venlafaxine (20-40 mg/kg i.p.) potentiated yohimbine induced lethality. PTZ induced toxicity was also enhanced with these agents. In the locomotor activity test H. perforatum decreased the locomotor counts of mice similar to standard antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: H. perforatum has antidepressant properties similar to standard antidepressants. The antidepressant profile of H. perforatum is closely related to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors class of antidepressants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicNatural Compound Pharmacology StudiesFrench-language works237,207