MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148734934 · doi:10.1139/v07-093

The contribution of XANES spectroscopy to tribology

2007· article· en· W2148734934 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark A. Nicholls, M.N. Najman, Z Zhang, M. Kasrai, P.R. Norton, Benjamin Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLubricants and Their Additives
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Materials Research
KeywordsXANESChemistryTribologyAbsorption (acoustics)SpectroscopyX-ray absorption spectroscopyAbsorption spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOrganic chemistryMetallurgyOpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) analysis has been routinely used to study the complex chemical interactions between additives in engine oil and metallic surfaces during high-temperature and pressure reciprocating wear conditions. XANES analysis provides detailed chemical and structural information on the resultant antiwear and tribo films formed on metallic surfaces. The following review will illustrate how XANES analysis on the macro scale can provide the information required to elucidate complex film formation mechanisms, then describes the use of emerging XANES spectromicroscopy to such systems, and concludes by showing the complementary nature of the macro and micro scale spatially resolved XANES analysis; Professor Bancroft has utilized the combination of these to stay at the forefront of XANES research in the field of tribology and in spectroscopy science in general.Key words: tribology, XANES, X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy, metals, thiophosphates, spectromicroscopy, tribochemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLubricants and Their AdditivesFrench-language works237,207