MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148795536 · doi:10.1145/1137856.1137883

Simple and semi-dynamic structures for cache-oblivious planar orthogonal range searching

2006· article· en· W2148795536 on OpenAlexaff
Lars Arge, Norbert Zeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimple (philosophy)Computer sciencePlanarCacheParallel computingRange (aeronautics)Materials scienceComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop improved cache-oblivious data structures for two- and three-sided planar orthogonal range searching. Our main result is an optimal static structure for two-sided range searching that uses linear space and supports queries in O(logBN + T/B) memory transfers, where B is the block size of any level in a multi-level memory hierarchy and T is the number of reported points. Our structure is the first linear-space cache-oblivious structure for a planar range searching problem with the optimal O(logBN + T/B) query bound. The structure is very simple, and we believe it to be of practical interest.We also show that our two-sided range search structure can be constructed cache-obliviously in O(N logBN) memory transfers. Using the logarithmic method and fractional cascading, this leads to a semi-dynamic linear-space structure that supports two-sided range queries in O(log2 N + T/B) memory transfers and insertions in O(log2N ⋅ logB N) memory transfers amortized. This structure is the first (semi-)dynamic structure for any planar range searching problem with a query bound that is logarithmic in the number of elements in the structure and linear in the output size.Finally, using a simple standard construction, we also obtain a static O(N log2 N)-space structure for three-sided range searching that supports queries in the optimal bound of O(logB N + T/B) memory transfers. These bounds match the bounds of the best previously known structure for this problem; but our structure is much simpler, simple enough, we believe, to be of practical interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207