Change in Neurocognitive Functioning After Treatment With Cranial Radiation in Childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the pattern of stability and change over time across multiple domains of neurocognitive function in radiated survivors of posterior fossa (PF) tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four children (25 males) treated for malignant PF tumors were observed with serial clinical neuropsychologic assessments. Thirty patients were treated for medulloblastoma and four patients were treated for ependymoma. Twelve patients were treated with reduced-dose and 21 patients were treated with standard-dose cranial radiation. All patients received an additional boost to the PF. One patient was treated with PF radiation only. Standardized neuropsychologic tests were administered at different times after diagnosis for each child. The rate of change in scores was determined using a mixed model regression. RESULTS: Results showed a 2- to 4-point decline per year in intelligence scores. For our relatively young sample, intellectual function declined quickly in the first few years after treatment, and then more gradually. Significant declines in visual-motor integration, visual memory, verbal fluency, and executive functioning were also documented. No decline was evident for verbal memory and receptive vocabulary. CONCLUSION: Cranial radiation is associated with a decline in multiple neurocognitive domains, with a few notable exceptions. Our results must be interpreted in the context of common limitations of clinical research, including patient variability, changes in test versions, small sample size, and clinical referral bias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".