MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148852123 · doi:10.1139/x09-106

Tree-line dynamics in relation to climate variability in the Shennongjia Mountains, central China

2009· article· en· W2148852123 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haishan Dang, Kerong Zhang, Yanjun Zhang, Shuduan Tan, Mingxi Jiang, Quanfa Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsTree lineMontane ecologyPrecipitationDendrochronologyClimate changeSubalpine forestEcologyGeographyPhysical geographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subalpine tree lines are particularly sensitive to climate variability. In this study, tree-ring chronologies and age structure of the subalpine fir Abies fargesii Franch. are developed to examine subalpine tree-line dynamics in relation to climate variability on the northern and southern aspects of the Shennongjia Mountains in central China. Response function analysis shows that radial growth is significantly positively correlated with temperatures during the previous November and in February and March of the current year on the northern aspect and with temperatures during the previous October and in March, April, and June of the current year on the southern aspect. Recruitment of A. fargesii is positively influenced by temperature in March and April on the northern aspect and in February, March, and May on the southern aspect. Precipitation shows no significant correlation with radial growth or recruitment of A. fargesii on either aspect. Thus, spring temperatures are the major factor limiting both radial growth and seedling establishment of this subalpine fir species. Radial growth and recruitment of A. fargesii show similar responses to climate variability and provide critical information for assessing the impacts of climate warming on tree-line dynamics, such as an increase in tree density and an upward shift of the altitudinal tree line in this mountainous region of central China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207