MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148866383 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.022970

Transcription Factor Expression Patterns in Bovine In Vitro-Derived Embryos Prior to Maternal-Zygotic Transition1

2004· article· en· W2148866383 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Vigneault, Serge McGraw, Lyne Massicotte, Marc‐André Sirard

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZygoteMaternal to zygotic transitionEmbryoBlastocystTranscription factorTranscription (linguistics)Embryonic stem cellGerminal vesicleEmbryogenesisMessenger RNAGeneticsCell biologyMolecular biologyAndrologyGeneOocyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maternal-zygotic transition (MZT) is a complex phenomenon characterized by the initiation of transcription in the embryo and the replacement of maternal mRNA with embryonic mRNA. In order for this to occur, transcriptional activation requires various factors and conditions. Our hypothesis is that the lack of transcription in the bovine pre-MZT embryo is due, in part, to an incomplete or dormant transcriptional apparatus. Therefore, in accordance with this hypothesis, functioning transcriptional mechanisms should appear in the eight-cell bovine embryo to facilitate embryonic transcription during the MZT. With this in mind, we examined the presence of selected transcription factors during preimplantation embryo development to establish how their transcript levels change in bovine pre-MZT embryos. To achieve this goal, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify the mRNA level of several different transcription factors (YY1, HMGA1, RY-1, P300, CREB, YAP65, HMGN1, HMGB1, NFAR, OCT-4, TEAD2, ATF-1, HMGN2, MSY2, and TBP) in germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase II (MII) bovine oocytes and in two-, four-, eight-cell, and blastocyst stage embryos produced in vitro. Our results demonstrate that all genes examined can be grouped into five different categories according to their mRNA expression patterns at the developmental stages observed. To summarize, all transcription factors studied were present in pre-MZT embryos and the expression pattern of many of them suggest a potential role in MZT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations128
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207