Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis une quinzaine d’années, différents types de recherches participatives montent en popularité, dont la recherche-action et la recherche collaborative. Ils ont en commun l’adoption d’un rapport plus symétrique entre chercheurs et praticiens et une préoccupation pour le développement professionnel de ces derniers. Néanmoins, ils diffèrent en ce qui concerne certaines hypothèses théoriques/épistémologiques qui les sous-tendent et sur le plan de l’approche méthodologique. Cette contribution vise à présenter ces deux types de recherches pour en éclairer les enjeux et les défis particuliers, et pour interroger ce qu’ils impliquent en matière de rapport aux savoirs et de rapport à la production de savoirs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.167 | 0.185 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.050 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.027 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".