Pion fluctuation and its multiplicity dependence in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the multiplicity dependence of the fluctuation pattern of pions produced for 16 O–AgBr interactions at 60 A GeV and 32 S–AgBr interactions at 200 A GeV. We divided the data for the pions produced into four sets depending on the number of shower tracks (n s ). We investigated the fluctuation pattern of emitted pions corresponding to different sets in both η (pseudorapidity) and ϕ (azimuthal angle) space. The multiplicity dependence was studied with respect to parameters α q , D q , multifractal specific heat c, and effective fluctuation strength α eff . The study clearly indicates that the fluctuation pattern depends on multiplicity both in pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle space for 16 O initiated interactions. However, for 32 S initiated interactions, no multiplicity dependence is evidenced by the data in azimuthal angle space. For both, the multiplicity dependence is not very strong and significant only at large average multiplicity. Multiplicity dependence was further studied in a small window around the central pseudorapidity, and we found that multiplicity dependence is more prominent in the central region. The multiplicity dependence of α eff is more pronounced in the case of 32 S–AgBr interactions than in case of 16 O–AgBr interactions. PACS Nos.: 25.75–q, 24.60 Ky
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".