Statistical Downscaling Prediction of Sea Surface Winds over the Global Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The statistical prediction of local sea surface winds from large-scale, free-tropospheric fields is investigated at a number of locations over the global ocean using a statistical downscaling model based on multiple linear regression. The predictands (the mean and standard deviation of both vector wind components and wind speed) calculated from ocean buoy observations on daily, weekly, and monthly scales are regressed on upper-level predictor fields from reanalysis products. It is found that in general the mean vector wind components are more predictable than mean wind speed in the North Pacific and Atlantic, while in the tropical Pacific and Atlantic the difference in predictive skill between mean vector wind components and wind speed is not substantial. The predictability of wind speed relative to vector wind components is interpreted by an idealized model of the wind speed probability density function, which indicates that in the midlatitudes the mean wind speed is more sensitive to the vector wind standard deviations (which generally are not well predicted) than to the mean vector winds. In the tropics, the mean wind speed is found to be more sensitive to the mean vector winds. While the idealized probability model does a good job of characterizing month-to-month variations in the mean wind speed in terms of the vector wind statistics, month-to-month variations in the standard deviation of speed are not well modeled. A series of Monte Carlo experiments demonstrates that the inconsistency in the characterization of wind speed standard deviation is the result of differences of sampling variability between the vector wind and wind speed statistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".