MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149106614 · doi:10.1517/14712598.6.1.73

The emerging role of recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) in the treatment of blunt traumatic haemorrhage

2005· review· en· W2149106614 on OpenAlexaff
Sandro Rizoli, Talat Chughtai

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Biological Therapy · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNovo Nordisk
KeywordsCoagulopathyMedicineRecombinant factor VIIaHaemophiliaCoagulationFactor VIITransfusion therapyFactor IXIntensive care medicineSurgeryBlood transfusionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa; eptacog alpha [activated], NovoSeven) is currently used for the management of a subgroup of haemophilia patients with inhibitors to Factors VIII or IX, and is under investigation as an adjuvant therapy for critical bleeding from other causes, including trauma. rFVIIa has a mode of action founded on physiological coagulation processes, and causes localised haemostasis at injury sites, both spontaneous and traumatic, with the capacity to correct the systemic coagulopathy associated with massive blood loss and its management. This review charts the development of rFVIIa as a new and potent adjuvant therapy for severe bleeding and coagulopathy caused by blunt trauma, where it is reported to produce rapid and significant haemostasis, reducing transfusion requirements and improving clinical outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Biological TherapySame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207