MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149130820 · doi:10.1109/mmsp.2002.1203329

Eyeball Video Communications Platform

2004· article· en· W2149130820 on OpenAlexaff
J. Vass, Shoaib Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsEyeball (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThe InternetTelecommunicationsBroadbandFirewall (physics)WirelessMultimediaWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eyeball Video Communications Platform (VCP) provides a comprehensive solution for video communications, instant messaging, remote collaboration and application development. Eyeball VCP supports one-to-one and many-to-many video communications and collaboration utilizing peer-to-peer data transport without employing any reflector service. This structure is not only cost effective but also provides minimal delay. Eyeball VCP is based on two key technologies: Eyeball Any-Bandwidth Technology and Eyeball Any-Firewall Technology . Eyeball Any-Bandwidth Technology guarantees the best possible audio-video quality for broadband, narrowband and wireless connections. Eyeball Any-Firewall Technology ensures that media can pass through both corporate and personal firewalls with minimal configuration without compromising security. Eyeball VCP is targeted for the following markets: application developers, Internet and communications service providers, and the medium and large enterprises. Eyeball VCP won several industry awards including Best of Show Award in Internet World, Product of the Year from the Communications ASP Magazine and The Editor's Choice Award from the Internet Telephony Magazine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207