Review: mothers with postpartum depression had to readjust expectations, cope with loss, and find ways to meet needs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beck CT. Postpartum depression: a metasynthesis. Qual Health Res2002 Apr ; 12 : 453 –72 .[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: What are the experiences of mothers who have postpartum depression? Studies were identified by searching CINAHL, PsycLIT, Index Medicus, Social Sciences Citation Index, American Humanities Index, Anthropological Literature, Sociological Abstracts, and Dissertation Abstracts. Studies were selected if they were qualitative studies on postpartum depression. Data were extracted on the key metaphors in each study and their relations with each other. Reciprocal translations were done so that the metaphors within each study could be related to those of other studies. The translations were synthesised by comparing them and determining the encompassing metaphors and themes. 18 studies (2 unpublished) were included. Study settings were USA (6 studies), UK (8 studies), Australia (3 studies), and Canada (1 study). Study designs included phenomenology (6 studies), general descriptive design (4 studies), ethnography (2 studies), grounded theory (2 studies), and 1 case study. The themes reflected 4 perspectives related to postpartum depression. … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DQualitative%2BHealth%2BResearch%26rft.stitle%253DQual%2BHealth%2BRes%26rft.aulast%253DBeck%26rft.auinit1%253DC.%2BT.%26rft.volume%253D12%26rft.issue%253D4%26rft.spage%253D453%26rft.epage%253D472%26rft.atitle%253DPostpartum%2BDepression%253A%2BA%2BMetasynthesis%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1177%252F104973202129120016%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11939248%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/104973202129120016&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11939248&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F5%2F4%2F128.1.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000174511200003&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".