MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149250951 · doi:10.1109/cic.1998.731911

State space modeling of cardiovascular regulation

2002· article· en· W2149250951 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew May, Ernest L. Fallen, M.V. Kamath

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyBreathingTidal volumeRespirationSingular value decompositionVolume (thermodynamics)MathematicsBlood pressureVentilation (architecture)Dead spaceInternal medicineControl theory (sociology)MedicineRespiratory systemPhysicsAnesthesiaComputer scienceAlgorithmAnatomyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A linear state-space model (LSSM) of cardiovascular regulation was developed using measurements of instantaneous lung volume (ILV), heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (APE) in 6 normal human volunteers (male, age: 22-30 yr., median 24 yr). The system order and an orthogonal basis for the state space of the system were estimated using the singular value decomposition (SVD) of a data matrix. The LSSM parameters were then found from the solution of an over-determined set of equations in least squares. The LSSM improves the phase function estimate and shows that (1) HR and ABP is most responsive to slow changes in ILV tidal volume when mean breathing frequency is 0.2-0.4 Hz (p>0.95) although system gain at these frequencies is reduced. (2) ANS responsiveness to changes in tidal volume increases linearly with frequency at slow (0.05-0.1 Hz) breathing rates (p>0.95). It is concluded that paced breathing system identification is a fast and non-invasive way to accurately characterize some of the physiological links between respiration, blood pressure and heart rate variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207