MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149252891 · doi:10.1016/j.rcae.2012.05.008

Strategies and obstacles to research development in anesthesiology programs: Consensus document in Colombia

2012· article· en· W2149252891 on OpenAlexaff
Jose Andrés Calvache, Luis Enrique Chaparro, Alexandra Chaves, Martha Delgado, Nelson Javier Fonseca-Ruiz, Félix R. Montes, Jairo Moyano, Jorge Rubio

Bibliographic record

VenueColombian Journal of Anesthesiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnesthesiologyLatin AmericansMedicineLibrary scienceIntensive carePain medicineMedical educationHumanitiesPolitical scienceAnesthesiaLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perioperative clinical practice in Latin America is influenced by research developed and published in developed countries. Fortunately, the increasingly favorable economic conditions for science in the developing countries, in addition to the heightened visibility of our scientific publications has triggered greater interest in improving the quality standards of local research and of the graduate theses generated in the course of graduate studies in anesthesiology. This document is the result of the active participation and discussion among the speakers attending the “Symposium on Research in Anesthesia: the path to participation in the society of knowledge”, organized by the Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation of Antioquia (SADEA) and the Colombian Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (SCARE) in 2011. The purpose of the document is to discuss the strategies to adjust, plan and improve the research processes, as well as the creation and dissemination of knowledge generated in Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care in Colombia and other developing countries. Recommendations have been included for graduate programs, health care providers and the societies of anesthesiology. La práctica clínica perioperatoria en Latinoamérica está influenciada por investigación generada y publicada en países desarrollados. Afortunadamente, las condiciones económicas cada vez más favorables para la ciencia en los países en vías de desarrollo, sumado al incremento en la visibilidad de nuestras publicaciones científicas, han desencadenado un incremento en el interés por mejorar los estándares de la calidad de la investigación local y a su vez en los trabajos de grado que se generan durante los estudios de posgrado en anestesiología. El presente documento es el resultado de la participación y discusión activa de los expositores y asistentes al evento: “Simposio de investigaciones en Anestesia: El camino para participar en la sociedad del conocimiento”, organizado por la Sociedad Antioqueña de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SADEA) y la Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SCARE) en el año 2011. El objetivo del documento es plantear estrategias para ajustar, planificar y mejorar los procesos de investigación, así como la creación y la divulgación del conocimiento generado en anestesiología, medicina del dolor y cuidado intensivo para Colombia y países afines. Incluimos recomendaciones para los programas de posgrado, las instituciones prestadoras de salud y sociedades de anestesiología.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueColombian Journal of AnesthesiologySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207