Nutritional stress causes male-biased sex ratios in eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nutritional variability in resources may cause differential mortality between sexes resulting in biased sex ratios. If males and females differ in fitness, then mortality of the more sensitive sex can cause a bias in sex ratios, and can stimulate dispersion of males. We reared three generations of spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens); Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on two artificial diets: a “normal” diet that provided all nutritional requirements for development and a “stress” diet (deficient in sugars and slightly higher in nitrogen), that simulated deterioration of food quality during outbreak conditions and had a detrimental impact on larval survival, development and growth. We tested the effects of continued nutritional stress on the sex ratio of pupae and adults. We found biased sex ratios in favour of males related to diet. Low quality food resulted in fewer females. This distortion was observed from the second generation onward, with a lower percentage of females reaching the pupal and adult stage. These results provide evidence that nutritional variation causes differential mortality between sexes, suggesting that females are more sensitive to nutritional stress. This is the first study that demonstrates sex ratio distortion due to nutritional selection pressure in spruce budworm. Our results indicate the importance of studying sex ratio distortion of spruce budworm in outbreak conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".