MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149354590 · doi:10.1074/mcp.m900566-mcp200

Deletion of Immunoproteasome Subunits Imprints on the Transcriptome and Has a Broad Impact on Peptides Presented by Major Histocompatibility Complex I molecules

2010· article· en· W2149354590 on OpenAlexafffund
Danielle de Verteuil, Tara L. Muratore‐Schroeder, Diana Paola Granados, Marie‐Hélène Fortier, Marie‐Pierre Hardy, Alexandre Bramoullé, Étienne Caron, Krystel Vincent, Sylvie Mader, Sébastien Lemieux, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMajor histocompatibility complexBiologyTranscriptomeProteasomeImmune systemProteomeCell biologyGeneMinor histocompatibility antigenProteomicsRepertoireProteolysisFunction (biology)Antigen presentationGeneticsT cellGene expressionBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteasome-mediated proteolysis plays a crucial role in many basic cellular processes. In addition to constitutive proteasomes (CPs), which are found in all eukaryotes, jawed vertebrates also express immunoproteasomes (IPs). Evidence suggests that the key role of IPs may hinge on their impact on the repertoire of peptides associated to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I molecules. Using a label-free quantitative proteomics approach, we identified 417 peptides presented by MHC I molecules on primary mouse dendritic cells (DCs). By comparing MHC I-associated peptides (MIPs) eluted from primary DCs and thymocytes, we found that the MIP repertoire concealed a cell type-specific signature correlating with cell function. Notably, mass spectrometry analyses of DCs expressing or not IP subunits MECL1 and LMP7 showed that IPs substantially increase the abundance and diversity of MIPs. Bioinformatic analyses provided evidence that proteasomes harboring LMP7 and MECL1 have specific cleavage preferences and recognize unstructured protein regions. Moreover, while differences in MIP repertoire cannot be attributed to potential effects of IPs on gene transcription, IP subunits deficiency altered mRNA levels of a set of genes controlling DC function. Regulated genes segregated in clusters that were enriched in chromosomes 4 and 8. Our peptidomic studies performed on untransfected primary cells provide a detailed account of the MHC I-associated immune self. This work uncovers the dramatic impact of IP subunits MECL1 and LMP7 on the MIP repertoire and their non-redundant influence on expression of immune-related genes. Proteasome-mediated proteolysis plays a crucial role in many basic cellular processes. In addition to constitutive proteasomes (CPs), which are found in all eukaryotes, jawed vertebrates also express immunoproteasomes (IPs). Evidence suggests that the key role of IPs may hinge on their impact on the repertoire of peptides associated to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I molecules. Using a label-free quantitative proteomics approach, we identified 417 peptides presented by MHC I molecules on primary mouse dendritic cells (DCs). By comparing MHC I-associated peptides (MIPs) eluted from primary DCs and thymocytes, we found that the MIP repertoire concealed a cell type-specific signature correlating with cell function. Notably, mass spectrometry analyses of DCs expressing or not IP subunits MECL1 and LMP7 showed that IPs substantially increase the abundance and diversity of MIPs. Bioinformatic analyses provided evidence that proteasomes harboring LMP7 and MECL1 have specific cleavage preferences and recognize unstructured protein regions. Moreover, while differences in MIP repertoire cannot be attributed to potential effects of IPs on gene transcription, IP subunits deficiency altered mRNA levels of a set of genes controlling DC function. Regulated genes segregated in clusters that were enriched in chromosomes 4 and 8. Our peptidomic studies performed on untransfected primary cells provide a detailed account of the MHC I-associated immune self. This work uncovers the dramatic impact of IP subunits MECL1 and LMP7 on the MIP repertoire and their non-redundant influence on expression of immune-related genes. Proteasomes are the main proteases responsible for protein degradation and the production of major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I)1 ligands (1.Rock K.L. Gramm C. Rothstein L. Clark K. Stein R. Dick L. Hwang D. Goldberg A.L. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules.Cell. 1994; 78: 761-771Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2194) Google Scholar, 2.Wherry E.J. Golovina T.N. Morrison S.E. Sinnathamby G. McElhaugh M.J. Shockey D.C. Eisenlohr L.C. Re-evaluating the generation of a "proteasome-independent" MHC class I-restricted CD8 T cell epitope.J. Immunol. 2006; 176: 2249-2261Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 3.Loureiro J. Ploegh H.L. Antigen presentation and the ubiquitin-proteasome system in host-pathogen interactions.Adv. Immunol. 2006; 92: 225-305Crossref PubMed Scopus (132) Google Scholar, 4.Shastri N. Cardinaud S. Schwab S.R. Serwold T. Kunisawa J. All the peptides that fit: the beginning, the middle, and the end of the MHC class I antigen-processing pathway.Immunol. Rev. 2005; 207: 31-41Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar). Proteasomes are much more ancient than MHC molecules. Whereas proteasomes are found in all eukaryotes, the MHC appeared only in jawed vertebrates. Proteasomal degradation regulates many basic cellular processes such as cell cycle and division, differentiation and development, response to stress and extracellular effectors, modulation of cell surface receptors, DNA repair, transcriptional regulation and biogenesis of organelles (5.Glickman M.H. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction.Physiol. Rev. 2002; 82: 373-428Crossref PubMed Scopus (3341) Google Scholar, 6.Deshaies R.J. Joazeiro C.A. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases.Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009; 78: 399-434Crossref PubMed Scopus (1876) Google Scholar). The 20S proteolytic core of the proteasome is hollow and provides an enclosed cavity open at both ends in which proteins are degraded (7.Kloetzel P.M. Antigen processing by the proteasome.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001; 2: 179-187Crossref PubMed Scopus (494) Google Scholar). The eukaryotic 20S particle is composed of 14 different subunits organized in a barrel-shaped complex with the stoichiometry α7β7β7α7. Three subunits of the two inner β-rings (β1, β2, and β5) participate directly in peptide bond cleavage. While all eukaryotes express the above-described constitutive proteasome (CP), gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) also express another form of proteasome, the immunoproteasome (IP). In IPs, the three catalytic β-subunits expressed in CPs are replaced by three interferon-γ–inducible homologues (immunosubunits): low molecular weight protein (LMP)-2 (or β1i) for β1, multicatalytic endopeptidase complex-like (MECL)-1 (or β2i) for β2, and LMP7 (or β5i) for β5. In gnathostomes, most cells express only CPs under steady state conditions and harbor IPs when exposed to interferon-γ (8.Heink S. Ludwig D. Kloetzel P.M. Kruger E. IFN-γ-induced immune adaptation of the proteasome system is an accelerated and transient response.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005; 102: 9241-9246Crossref PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In dendritic cells express both CPs and IPs of the proteasome in and DC the A. L. R. of the proteasome increase in the of immunoproteasome dendritic cell J. Immunol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in all that in the or of DCs express both CPs and IPs A. L. R. of the proteasome increase in the of immunoproteasome dendritic cell J. Immunol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). IPs are to the immune in all gnathostomes in analyses that proteasome than their constitutive A.L. of the proteasome PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. R.J. Bioinformatic of differences the immunoproteasome and the constitutive PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This a differentiation IPs and the role of IPs, that their and that the key role of IPs may hinge on their impact on the repertoire of peptides associated to MHC I molecules. cell surface levels of MHC I molecules are in cells from and N. The proteasome is a T cell PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). studies of that MHC I-associated peptides be only by only by IPs, and by both of proteasomes (7.Kloetzel P.M. Antigen processing by the proteasome.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001; 2: 179-187Crossref PubMed Scopus (494) Google Scholar, J. a T in Immunol. Google Scholar, S. A.L. R. T. of by the proteasome not by the immunoproteasome in presentation by dendritic Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, of T cells at the levels of T cell repertoire and presentation of 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. S. S. T. cleavage of peptides by the immunoproteasome or by the proteasome in Immunol. 2006; 176: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, of processing the of Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. R. G. the of dendritic cells to PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In proteasome with IPs have and cleavage and more of MHC I C. K.L. Goldberg A.L. proteasomes and immunoproteasomes of an J. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, E. A. K. C. Kloetzel P.M. A. the in 20S proteasome the of and of the and of on the degradation Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In proteasome and cleavage preferences (7.Kloetzel P.M. Antigen processing by the proteasome.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001; 2: 179-187Crossref PubMed Scopus (494) Google Scholar, and in Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the studies cannot the impact of IPs on the MHC I peptide repertoire in for three in may not in most (MIPs) from degraded proteins that the a cleavage by proteasomes E. J. of mass MHC class I Rev. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, L.C. L. Golovina T.N. peptide to MHC class I Rev. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). MIP presentation is by of that only a of peptides by proteasomes are presented by MHC I molecules K. T. Goldberg A.L. K.L. The peptides and the of MHC class I Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. N. The the class I Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, of peptides major histocompatibility complex class I molecules by the Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). studies not account potential differences in regulation by CPs and Whereas CPs transcriptional R.J. for proteolysis in transcriptional Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R.J. role for in gene 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, The a for 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.R. S. of eukaryotic transcriptional by the proteasome Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google the potential impact of IPs on IPs and CPs MHC I presentation of a peptide not only by degradation of the protein also by of the gene that In the of work to a and of the impact of IPs on the repertoire of MIPs. we a label-free quantitative to the MIP repertoire of DCs expressing or not expressing IP subunits MECL1 and LMP7 M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). we the gene expression of two DC cells were on a and in a specific and histocompatibility histocompatibility molecular weight with endopeptidase I-associated were from The were provided by from the of the of major histocompatibility complex constitutive proteasome dendritic cell immunoproteasome major histocompatibility complex low molecular weight protein with multicatalytic endopeptidase MHC I-associated peptide DCs were from and as D. J. of on the and of dendritic cells under J. Immunol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. T. T. for dendritic cells from mouse Immunol. 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). cells were from and of to and in at cells in of with and of of with and of with were DC the cells at 8. were from DC cells were and with or and MHC I cells were with and and with and were with the from were with mouse cells were on were performed on a and DCs were and in a and were by and with the and from and from and from and from with or the and a system were the Three DCs were from a of and were as M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google with S. C. D.C. C. of a of histocompatibility in Immunol. Google were an system to were on a with were with a of were in and to a MIP were in and by on a mass M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Full mass were with the at a of and mass were in with the an mass or and and provided mass for all were and were were performed an mouse and with a mass of and a of were performed and a of All were an MHC on the mouse MHC I were to peptide and for all a of M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were and to the abundance of identified peptides with on and and This in a of non-redundant peptide clusters for all of all to be were for mass and were The to MIP The C. N. A. N. R. J. D. A. T. K. analyses of the immune Biol. PubMed Scopus Google to enriched of and associated to peptide genes from DCs and The of in the work provided to The and A. the of Rev. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In were performed as with M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). are more than S. D. G. A.L. S. of of by T cells in J. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. for and of Immunol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R. to to by T cells of cells a cell PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and DCs were from both on and from the with or with or were as cells in R. to to by T cells of cells a cell PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). cells were and The of specific as of cells of cells of cells with of cells of cells All 417 peptides from DCs were in studies of in MIPs. In analyses of we peptides that from proteins with different or for analyses of for for were to their in abundance as by a to at by at the the of performed to the The performed for of the MHC peptides as as for of the peptide and of the that a we the to which specific were or in as to The to and the to unstructured in proteins low S. D. of protein 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The of from unstructured in or in of IP a from and DCs with as by the were and the and the with the on at the core of the for for and to the were a at were and the analyses were performed The have in under to abundance in to the MIP abundance and mRNA The set of the S. J. an system for gene in 2005; PubMed Scopus Google to the of the expressed and the gene on specific chromosomes the for and and of gene 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the impact of IPs on the MIP we to DCs are cells and express Using a label-free quantitative proteomics M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google we eluted from and DCs DCs express both CPs and IPs DCs under in conditions A. L. R. of the proteasome increase in the of immunoproteasome dendritic cell J. Immunol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google DCs not express the LMP7 and MECL1 IP subunits are the of proteasomes IP and subunits S. R. Kloetzel P.M. The subunits and are for the 20S Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In with we a in the of protein in that is in the of the two a we DCs from is for of I cells are MHC DCs from and a eluted from DCs were by a by with were from to the of identified The peptide were conditions and analyses to peptide and their in of eluted from cells specific of M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were for all MIPs. The were to peptide with specific MHC I and and M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This in the of 417 from in DCs that eluted from from abundance in the than in M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This that the MIP repertoire a cell type-specific directly we the MIP repertoire of DCs to that of M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google from the of identified more peptides in DCs than in This be at in to the that MHC I molecules are much more on DCs than In both cell we found more peptides associated to MHC than to MHC the of peptides with a in DCs than in the key that of peptides eluted from were not in DC we peptides from than from DCs This that of at the surface of are also on DCs are 417 peptides from were with thymocytes, were the MIP repertoire cell type-specific we the C. N. A. N. R. J. D. A. T. K. analyses of the immune Biol. PubMed Scopus Google to in the specific were in the of genes peptides eluted from DCs In and of peptide genes were to specific Notably, of genes of the were associated with in the DC gene MIP genes were to in both DCs and and peptide genes to specific were enriched in DCs or of the and differentiation of DCs and the MIP repertoire of DCs enriched in peptides genes are in proteasome and peptide genes in and cell cycle were in the MIP DC and gene a of and their genes be found in that the MIP repertoire a cell type-specific signature that the impact of IPs on the MIP we eluted from and DCs by as in In with studies M.H. E. G. S. C. The MHC class I peptide repertoire is by the PubMed Scopus Google we found that of peptide showed a of than in abundance we that peptides were presented by MHC I molecules when the in abundance and DCs than the 417 peptides eluted from were expressed at levels in DCs peptides were in to were in peptides were to in to DCs and were to with the differences in abundance are in and the of peptides is in In with on MIP analyses as N. The proteasome is a T cell PubMed Scopus Google expression of cell surface and by on than DCs protein analyses on cell showed that cellular of and were in both of DCs that the of surface expressed MHC I on DCs by a peptide and not an altered of MHC I molecules most in to I protein protein protein 4 domain to to protein that were not on cells were attributed the which the for of with the peptides for which the not be were only in for a of on in a that were not on cells were attributed the which the for of with the peptides for which the not be were only in for a of on with T cells not cells peptidomic analyses that peptides were on peptides were found only on DCs is with the that were for not S. C. A. Dick J. C. S. cleavage of constitutive and immunoproteasomes by quantitative of cleavage 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). DCs may not be when and DCs were with and in T DCs to be than DCs that the of IPs a major impact on the MIP by both the abundance and the diversity of MIPs. Proteasomal cleavage the of their be by in the and the E. J. of mass MHC class I Rev. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. N. The the class I Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Proteasomal cleavage be by to the cleavage on S. C. A. Dick J. C. S. cleavage of constitutive and immunoproteasomes by quantitative of cleavage 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, N. N. S. S. the processing of MHC class I Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the MIP repertoire in the or of IPs cleavage we the of and their The 417 peptides from DCs were in studies of in MIPs. In analyses of we peptides that from proteins with different or peptides were to their in abundance as by with are a to at peptide as a by than the performed to the The performed for of the MHC peptides as as for of the peptide and of the in at of the not we found of at two peptide of the and of the of performed a detailed of at and the peptides in cells showed of and is not and processing MIP their E. J. C. L. J. major role for in degradation for MHC class I Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, D. N. The the peptide repertoire by major histocompatibility complex class I Immunol. 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). work is to the of the at peptides that have at dramatic and by an of and and with a of and and and are enriched in and and are enriched in unstructured protein which of the J. regulation of unstructured from to protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. The of or Mol. Biol. 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The which to unstructured and S. D. of protein 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Using we found that of peptides more from unstructured protein than of peptides The IP unstructured protein specific for to the MIP and not for the MIP for of their not that IPs specific cleavage preferences and that the of IPs to MHC I presentation of peptide the unstructured from their role in protein CPs also R.J. for proteolysis in transcriptional Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R.J. role for in gene 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, The a for 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.R. S. of eukaryotic transcriptional by the proteasome Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). IPs may than CPs is we not a that peptide in DCs to degradation of peptide proteins by IPs also the MIP repertoire by regulation of peptide genes. we the of and DCs found that genes and to of the were expressed and DCs and and MIP abundance that expression of in DCs cannot be to of peptide genes. a set of expressed in the or of The were not in the were in in chromosomes and and in chromosomes and The gene clusters were enriched in chromosomes 4 and and expressed genes be to DC we on for which of expressed we for which were or when the evidence from that not by a and of genes a or role in DC or immune genes were to immune DC and DC of genes to is in that IPs have a non-redundant impact on expression of a of set of genes that different of DC function. By a label-free quantitative proteomics approach, we the impact of IPs on the molecular of the immune self. Our peptidomic studies to a most of the MIP we untransfected primary provide a and of the MHC immune self. The work three major the MIP repertoire a cell type-specific the MIP repertoire of DCs and than of their were cell The of cell the that from expressed proteins A.L. peptides by class I molecules are from of a set of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. A. processing by of the class I MHC associated peptide Immunol. 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). to DCs or cell and The DCs that we were antigen-processing cells with a by the MIP repertoire of DCs enriched in peptides by genes proteasome differentiation and have a and a of with of cells their in the MIP genes were cell cycle and The that a of are cell to at the the of the MHC immune is The cell and are in the cell both from In the be to the MIP repertoire of DCs to that of proteomics analyses of from and DCs that IPs increase the abundance and diversity of MIPs. In with DCs were for not Our on of and at the non-redundant of IPs, and not the non-redundant of the impact of IPs on the MIP repertoire in addition to DCs from may harbor a proteasomes with and catalytic be that all of IP is not a the and the genes are is to by with be to cells with a R. for proteasome Biol. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). also be with a block the proteolytic of IP subunits not effects that IP subunits have on IP function. evidence suggests that of in of the 20S IP and their a is not in cells be in the of a LMP7 which is to (7.Kloetzel P.M. Antigen processing by the proteasome.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001; 2: 179-187Crossref PubMed Scopus (494) Google Scholar, J. of an is by proteasome and of the Immunol. Google Scholar). the generation of that not be by Our that IPs increase MIP abundance with in proteasome IPs have and cleavage than CPs C. K.L. Goldberg A.L. proteasomes and immunoproteasomes of an J. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, E. A. K. C. Kloetzel P.M. A. the in 20S proteasome the of and of the and of on the degradation Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google and with the cell surface levels of MHC I molecules on and N. The proteasome is a T cell PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). presented in the not to from in proteasome the impact of IPs on the diversity of the MIP repertoire in Our work provides a and of the impact of IPs on MIP 417 peptides eluted from were in to DCs and were in of of were also that IPs cleavage that on the MIP of primary The most and peptides found at at by an of and with of and The most the of at in to is with the work by in with CPs or IPs, peptide by and found that at by IPs and in Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). analyses that IPs have a unstructured protein and to MHC I presentation of the unstructured The of and such as surface and J. regulation of unstructured from to protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). unstructured proteins are to molecular and their is for a cell as to cell or J. regulation of unstructured from to protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. R. protein and are associated with 2009; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The MIP repertoire presentation of only a of the to CD8 T cells E. J. of mass MHC class I Rev. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R. G. S. C. The and of account for on the MHC I Immunol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the of IPs unstructured protein be of for in of peptidomic with of the DC that expression of in DCs cannot be to of peptide genes. we found that IPs have a non-redundant impact on expression of a set of IPs may expression of genes with to genes by IPs and evidence suggests that the role of IPs is not to processing peptides for MHC presentation Proteasomes in immune more than peptide Rev. Immunol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). MECL1 is a T cells from in response to and of LMP7 production by and T cells N. The proteasome is a T cell PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, K. L. T cells immunoproteasome subunits and LMP7 in response to Immunol. 2006; 176: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. E. C. C. J. J. of the immunoproteasome LMP7 production and of 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The work suggests that effects of IPs may be by a non-redundant of IPs on gene expression of immune genes DCs with levels of peptide are than DCs work is to IPs may gene is to that genes on which IPs a non-redundant were in the in eukaryotes is not In all genes of expression to be in clusters that to many C. M.J. The of eukaryotic gene Rev. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). from the of D. N. The role of in the expression of Rev. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In with proteasome 20S core transcriptional by controlling the and of transcriptional and proteolytic degradation R.J. for proteolysis in transcriptional Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R.J. role for in gene 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, The a for 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.R. S. of eukaryotic transcriptional by the proteasome Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). that the non-redundant of IPs on gene expression may from proteolysis of transcriptional or their The of work is that IP subunits MECL1 and LMP7 have more than non-redundant have a dramatic impact on the MIP repertoire and a impact on expression of immune-related genes. of effects are of in immune and may be in the of IPs in T. A. for the for with analyses and for are to the of the core at the for in and for their and with

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular & Cellular ProteomicsSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207