Role of chemoreception in cardiorespiratory acclimatization to, and deacclimatization from, hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During sojourn to high altitudes, progressive time-dependent increases occur in ventilation and in sympathetic nerve activity over several days, and these increases persist upon acute restoration of normoxia. We discuss evidence concerning potential mediators of these changes, including the following: 1) correction of alkalinity in cerebrospinal fluid; 2) increased sensitivity of carotid chemoreceptors; and 3) augmented translation of carotid chemoreceptor input (at the level of the central nervous system) into increased respiratory motor output via sensitization of hypoxic sensitive neurons in the central nervous system and/or an interdependence of central chemoreceptor responsiveness on peripheral chemoreceptor sensory input. The pros and cons of chemoreceptor sensitization and cardiorespiratory acclimatization to hypoxia and intermittent hypoxemia are also discussed in terms of their influences on arterial oxygenation, the work of breathing, sympathoexcitation, systemic blood pressure, and exercise performance. We propose that these adaptive processes may have negative implications for the cardiovascular health of patients with sleep apnea and perhaps even for athletes undergoing regimens of "sleep high-train low"!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".