MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149465849 · doi:10.1109/pac.1997.753434

Encapsulated target for isotope production cyclotrons

2002· article· en· W2149465849 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Bakhtiari, W. Gelbart, Wendy Ho, N.R. Stevenson

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersTRIUMF
KeywordsCyclotronThermocoupleMaterials scienceBeam (structure)FOIL methodNuclear engineeringProtonHot cellWeldingAluminiumNuclear physicsComposite materialOpticsElectronPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current solid isotope production targets at TRIUMF can only be used to irradiate metallic materials with high melting points. In order to irradiate liquids, powders, and materials with low melting points, a new encapsulated target is being developed specifically for use on isotope production cyclotrons. This concentrically water-cooled target must withstand a 240 /spl mu/A@30 MeV proton beam. The target is a round container with a pocket to hold the target material; the target material is encapsulated using a thin foil, which is electron-beam welded onto the target. The cooling and the heat-induced stresses of the target are being analysed using finite element methods. The results will then be compared with actual measurements obtained using surface embedded thermocouples. The paper discusses the results and the current status of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167)Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207