A novel approach for gesture control video games based on perceptual features: modelling, tracking and recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gesture recognition has been an attractive research area for decades. Recently, the video game industry has become the major driving force for the development of advanced gesture control technologies. Conventional video games are controlled via physical devices. In contrast, the emerging trend is using camera-based human computer interface (HCI) to capture human gestures and control game playing directly. This paper presents a novel approach for facilitating the development of gesture control-based video games. A time-of-flight (TOF) camera is adopted to provide both depth and greyscale image sequences. 3D perceptual gesture features are extracted and grouped into a generic gesture representation for target gesture recognition. The game control parameters are derived from the recognised gestures on the fly. This framework includes five key modules: 1 perceptual feature extraction 2 object tracking by perceptual grouping 3 representation and modelling 4 gesture recognition 5 game control parameter generation. A proof-of-concept dart game is implemented for demonstration and evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it