Globally optimal uneven error-protected packetization of scalable code streams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this extended abstract we present a family of new algorithms for rate-fidelity optimal packetization of scalable source bit stream with uneven error protection. In the most general setting where no assumption is made on the probability function of packet loss or on the rate-fidelity function of the scalable code stream, one of our algorithms can find the globally optimal solution to the problem in O(N/sup 2/L/sup 2/) time, compared to a previously claimed O(N/sup 3/L/sup 2/) complexity, where N is the number of packets and L is the packet payload size. The time complexity can be reduced to O(NL/sup 2/) if the rate-fidelity function of the input is convex and under the reasonable assumption that the probability function of packet loss is monotonically decreasing. In the convex case the algorithm of Mohr et al. (2000) has complexity O(N/sup 2/L log N). Furthermore, our O(NL/sup 2/) algorithm for the convex case can be modified to find an approximation solution for the general case that is better than the results of other algorithms in the prior literature. All of our algorithms do away with the expediency of fractional redundancy allocation, a limitation of some existing algorithms. To our best knowledge this work offers for the first time globally optimal solutions to the important problem of optimal UEP packetization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".