Globally optimal uneven error-protected packetization of scalable code streams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this extended abstract we present a family of new algorithms for rate-fidelity optimal packetization of scalable source bit stream with uneven error protection. In the most general setting where no assumption is made on the probability function of packet loss or on the rate-fidelity function of the scalable code stream, one of our algorithms can find the globally optimal solution to the problem in O(N/sup 2/L/sup 2/) time, compared to a previously claimed O(N/sup 3/L/sup 2/) complexity, where N is the number of packets and L is the packet payload size. The time complexity can be reduced to O(NL/sup 2/) if the rate-fidelity function of the input is convex and under the reasonable assumption that the probability function of packet loss is monotonically decreasing. In the convex case the algorithm of Mohr et al. (2000) has complexity O(N/sup 2/L log N). Furthermore, our O(NL/sup 2/) algorithm for the convex case can be modified to find an approximation solution for the general case that is better than the results of other algorithms in the prior literature. All of our algorithms do away with the expediency of fractional redundancy allocation, a limitation of some existing algorithms. To our best knowledge this work offers for the first time globally optimal solutions to the important problem of optimal UEP packetization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it