The Paq'tnkek Mi'kmaq and Ka't (American Eel): A Case Study of Cultural relations, Meanings and Prospects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mi’kmaq have a deep and rich relationship with Ka’t (American eelAnguilla rostrata). While the Mi’kmaq continue to harvest Ka’t for food, their relations with and use of eel also embody important cultural meanings and practices. Ka’t occupies a notable place within many ceremonial settings, is used for medicinal purposes and, as a consequence of the ways in which Ka’t is shared, is central to traditional relations of reciprocity. Over recent decades, however, the commercialisation of eel fishing in Atlantic Canada has led to a decline in their numbers and has contributed to a significant reduction in eel fishing and eel use among the Mi’kmaq. Loss of access to eel may well translate into a much broader process of cultural loss, as the ceremonial and sharing practices centred on the fishing and consumption of eel disappear. However, legal precedents affirming treaty entitlements are positioning the Mi’kmaq to assume a more proactive role in managing both commercial and food fisheries. This paper reviews recent trends and discusses these issues with reference to the results of research carried out with Paq’tnkek (Afton), a Mi’kmaq community in northeastern Nova Scotia. The Paq’tnkek Mi’kmaq relations with Ka’t are described and discussed with respect to their cultural meanings and prospects. Implications for the revitalisation and empowerment of indigenous cultures are drawn from the lessons evident in this case study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it