MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149666184 · doi:10.1534/genetics.106.057562

A Nonself Recognition Gene Complex in<i>Neurospora crassa</i>

2006· article· en· W2149666184 on OpenAlexaff
Cristina Micali, Myron L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNeurospora crassaGeneticsLocus (genetics)GeneAlleleHeterokaryonCrassaNeurosporaMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonself recognition is exemplified in the fungal kingdom by the regulation of cell fusion events between genetically different individuals (heterokaryosis). The het-6 locus is one of approximately 10 loci that control heterokaryon incompatibility during vegetative growth of N. crassa. Previously, it was found that het-6-associated incompatibility in Oak Ridge (OR) strains involves two contiguous genes, het-6 and un-24. The OR allele of either gene causes "strong" incompatibility (cell death) when transformed into Panama (PA)-background strains. Several remarkable features of the locus include the nature of these incompatibility genes (het-6 is a member of a repetitive gene family and un-24 also encodes the large subunit of ribonucleotide reductase) and the observation that un-24 and het-6 are in severe linkage disequilibrium. Here, we identify "weak" (slow, aberrant growth) incompatibility activities by un-24PA and het-6PA when transformed separately into OR strains, whereas together they exhibit an additive, strong effect. We synthesized strains with the new allelic combinations un-24PA het-6OR and un-24OR het-6PA, which are not found in nature. These strains grow normally and have distinct nonself recognition capabilities but may have reduced fitness. Comparing the Oak Ridge and Panama het-6 regions revealed a paracentric inversion, the architecture of which provides insights into the evolution of the un-24-het-6 gene complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneticsSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207