MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149771710 · doi:10.1149/1.2355708

Metal/High-K Interface Interactions Upon High Temperature Annealing - Are They Cause of Workfunction Changes

2006· article· en· W2149771710 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Conard, T. Schram, A. Akheyar, Kai Arstila, Gerd Zschaetzsch, Wilfried Vandervorst, Stefan De Gendt, Vasile Paraschiv, Bert Brijs, Zhuoling Jiang, J. Lerma, Vidya Kaushik, L.-Å. Ragnarsson, D.P. Brunco

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
FundersFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)TinX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceMetal gateHigh-κ dielectricWork functionMetalSiliconOxideStack (abstract data type)NitrogenAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringOptoelectronicsChemistryDielectricGate oxideMetallurgyComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The replacement of poly-silicon by metallic compounds in the gate stack leads to the search of metals with suitable work function. However, it is observed that thermal budget has a large influence on the effective work functions of several metals. In this paper, we investigated the possible modification of the chemical states by physical analysis techniques (XPS, ERD, SIMS) by studying investigating the chemistry of the high-k oxide/metal interface. We show that in the case of the TiN/TaN/HfO2/SiO2/Si stack, several modifications occur upon 1000{degree sign}C N2 annealing: Increase of the nitrogen content of the TaN, interdiffusion of the Ti and TaN, and formation of Ta2O5 at the TaN/HfO2 interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207