A loss of genome buffering capacity of Dahl salt-sensitive model to modulate blood pressure as a cause of hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essential hypertension is a complex trait influenced by multiple genes known as quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for blood pressure (BP). It is not clear, however, what roles these QTLs play in maintaining normotension. Insights gained toward the maintenance of normotension will shed light on how hypertension can result from a deficiency or malfunctioning of this maintenance. Currently, congenic strains were systematically constructed using Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) and Lewis (LEW) rats not only to define QTLs (i.e. in DSS background), but also to ascertain effects of the same QTLs in preserving normotension (i.e. in LEW background), a first such study. Results showed that although LEW alleles for two QTLs on Chromosome (Chr) 18 lowered BP on the DSS background, their BP-increasing DSS alleles failed to influence BP in the LEW background. To further prove that the LEW background is resistant and the DSS background is susceptible to the effects of QTLs, BP-increasing alleles of a QTL on Chr 2 were introgressed into the DSS background, and its BP-decreasing alleles into the LEW background. Indeed, there was no BP-decreasing effect on the LEW background while demonstrating a BP-increasing effect on the DSS background. Thus, a genetic regulation of BP QTLs in the LEW genome inhibits BP changes by nullifying the effects of BP-altering QTLs. In comparison, the DSS genome must have lost the buffering capacity for stabilizing BP. The current work presents good evidence that a lack of regulation for functions of BP QTLs is a potential underlying cause of hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".