MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149810437 · doi:10.1149/05002.0649ecst

Liquid Water Scavenging of PEMFC Contaminants

2013· article· en· W2149810437 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Wetton, Jean St‐Pierre

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellContaminationChemistryMass transferDissociation (chemistry)Environmental chemistryScavengingSolubilityEthylene glycolMembraneChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models were derived for the scavenging effect of product liquid water on airborne proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) contaminants. A time scale analysis of contaminant mass transfer processes, product water accumulation in the gas diffusion electrode, and dissociation reactions indicated that the contaminant saturates the product liquid water simplifying model derivation. The baseline model only accounts for contaminant solubility and shows a large effect for ethylene glycol. An extension to this model was derived for the presence of contaminant dissociation reactions within the product liquid water using SO2 as a model contaminant. The extended model demonstrates the large impact of dissociation reactions at low SO2 concentrations. For both models, explicit expressions for the average gas phase contaminant concentration within the fuel cell were also derived and can be used as a surrogate for the effective contaminant concentration to correlate the fuel cell performance loss and facilitate the definition of tolerance limits and filtering equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207