Organization of visual mossy fiber projections and zebrin expression in the pigeon vestibulocerebellum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extensive research has revealed a fundamental organization of the cerebellum consisting of functional parasagittal zones. This compartmentalization has been well documented with respect to physiology, biochemical markers, and climbing fiber afferents. Less is known about the organization of mossy fiber afferents in general, and more specifically in relation to molecular markers such as zebrin. Zebrin is expressed by Purkinje cells that are distributed as a parasagittal array of immunopositive and immunonegative stripes. We examined the concordance of zebrin expression with visual mossy fiber afferents in the vestibulocerebellum (folium IXcd) of pigeons. Visual afferents project directly to folium IXcd as mossy fibers and indirectly as climbing fibers via the inferior olive. These projections arise from two retinal recipient nuclei: the lentiformis mesencephali (LM) and the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR). Although it has been shown that these two nuclei project to folium IXcd, the detailed organization of these projections has not been reported. We injected anterograde tracers into LM and nBOR to investigate the organization of mossy fiber terminals and subsequently related this organization to the zebrin antigenic map. We found a parasagittal organization of mossy fiber terminals in folium IXcd and observed a consistent relationship between mossy fiber organization and zebrin stripes: parasagittal clusters of mossy fiber terminals were concentrated in zebrin-immunopositive regions. We also describe the topography of projections from LM and nBOR to the inferior olive and relate these results to previous studies on the organization of climbing fibers and zebrin expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".