MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149958134 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2009.2030689

Compact High-Performance Multimode Interference Couplers in Silicon-on-Insulator

2009· article· en· W2149958134 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Halir, Alejandro Ortega‐Moñux, I. Molina-Fernadez, J. Gonzalo Wangüemert‐Pérez, Pavel Cheben, Dan‐Xia Xu, B. Lamontagne, Siegfried Janz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNotationExtinction ratioSilicon on insulatorPhysicsTransverse planePolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsSiliconMathematicsOptoelectronicsEngineeringChemistryWavelengthArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> We demonstrate compact multimode interference (MMI) couplers on silicon-on-insulator that exhibit both high performance and relaxed tolerances. The devices are fabricated with a single shallow etch step on 1.5-<formula formulatype="inline"> <tex Notation="TeX">$\mu$</tex></formula>m-thick silicon, and have a footprint of 12.8 <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\mu$</tex></formula>m<formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\,\times\,$</tex></formula>456 <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\mu$</tex></formula>m, including 100-<formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\mu$</tex></formula>m-long tapers at input and output. In a Mach–Zehnder configuration, we achieve an extinction ratio larger than 22 dB for transverse-electric polarization and larger than 20 dB for transverse-magnetic polarization. This extinction ratio is maintained in the full 1520- to 1580-nm band and for MMI width variations in a range of 0.45 <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\mu$</tex> </formula>m. We also show appreciable tolerance differences between paired and general excitation MMIs. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207