MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2149991232 · doi:10.1029/2009jd013525

Negligible climatic effects from the 2008 Okmok and Kasatochi volcanic eruptions

2010· article· en· W2149991232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ben Kravitz, Alan Robock, Adam Bourassa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsStratosphereRadiative forcingAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceRadiative transferAerosolTroposphereVolcanoShortwaveSulfate aerosolClimatologyForcing (mathematics)PrecipitationOptical depthClimate modelGeologyPhysicsClimate changeMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used a general circulation model of Earth's climate to conduct simulations of climate response to the July 12, 2008, eruption of Okmok volcano and the August 8, 2008, eruption of Kasatochi volcano, which injected a total of 1.6 Tg of SO2 into the Arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (0.1 Tg from Okmok and 1.5 Tg from Kasatochi). For the climate model simulations, we placed all the SO2 into the lower stratosphere. The temporal and spatial distribution of model predictions of sulfate aerosol optical depth agrees with measurements made by the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imaging System (OSIRIS), a Canadian satellite instrument. After accounting for differences due to different wavelengths, different sampling volumes, and an overestimate of stratospheric SO2 loading in the model, the optical depths measured by OSIRIS are consistent with the modeled values. Although the shortwave radiative effects of the eruption are detectable in model output, perturbations in surface air temperature and precipitation were negligible, since the Okmok injection was quite small and the Kasatochi eruption was too late in the year for there to have been large radiative forcing in 2008 and was of insufficient magnitude for the sulfate aerosols to persist in the stratosphere into the following spring. We conducted further experiments with lower stratospheric injections of 3 and 5 Tg of SO2 into the Arctic on August 8, 2008. Although the sulfate aerosol optical depth and resulting shortwave radiative forcing increase linearly with atmospheric loading of SO2, the radiative forcing was still small due to the timing of the eruption, with little insolation by the time the sulfate aerosol cloud would form. High latitude eruptions of this size occurring in August or later in the calendar year would still be of insufficient magnitude for the sulfate aerosols to persist in the stratosphere into the following spring, and climate effects would be negligible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→