Large-Scale Expansion of Pluripotent Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Stirred-Suspension Bioreactors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the derivation of human embryonic stem (hES) cells, their translation to clinical therapies has been met with several challenges, including the need for large-scale expansion and controlled differentiation processes. Suspension bioreactors are an effective alternative to static culture flasks as they enable the generation of clinically relevant cell numbers with greater efficacy in a controlled culture system. We, along with other groups, have developed bioreactor protocols for the expansion of pluripotent murine ES cells. Here we present a novel bioreactor protocol that yields a 25-fold expansion of hES cells over 6 days. Using immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and teratoma formation assays, we demonstrated that these bioreactor cultures retained high levels of pluripotency and a normal karyotype. Importantly, the use of bioreactors enables the expansion of hES cells in the absence of feeder layers or matrices, which will facilitate the adaptation of good manufacturing process (GMP) standards to the development of hES cell therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".