Large-Scale Expansion of Pluripotent Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Stirred-Suspension Bioreactors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the derivation of human embryonic stem (hES) cells, their translation to clinical therapies has been met with several challenges, including the need for large-scale expansion and controlled differentiation processes. Suspension bioreactors are an effective alternative to static culture flasks as they enable the generation of clinically relevant cell numbers with greater efficacy in a controlled culture system. We, along with other groups, have developed bioreactor protocols for the expansion of pluripotent murine ES cells. Here we present a novel bioreactor protocol that yields a 25-fold expansion of hES cells over 6 days. Using immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and teratoma formation assays, we demonstrated that these bioreactor cultures retained high levels of pluripotency and a normal karyotype. Importantly, the use of bioreactors enables the expansion of hES cells in the absence of feeder layers or matrices, which will facilitate the adaptation of good manufacturing process (GMP) standards to the development of hES cell therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it