The theoretical foundations of statistical learning theory based on fuzzy random samples in Sugeno measure space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Statistical learning theory is regarded as an appropriate theory to deal with learning problems on small samples, and it has now become a novel research interest of the machine learning field. However, the theory is based on real-valued random samples and established on probability measure space; it rarely deals with learning problems based on fuzzy random samples and established on Sugeno measure space. It is well known that fuzzy random samples and Sugeno measure space are interesting and important extensions of real-valued random samples and probability measure space, respectively. Therefore, the statistical learning theory based on fuzzy random samples in Sugeno measure space is further discussed in this paper. Firstly, based on definitions of the distribution function and the expected value of fuzzy random variables in Sugeno measure space, the Hoeffding inequality of fuzzy random variables is proved. Secondly, for the sake of completeness of the paper, the key theorem of learning theory based on fuzzy random samples in Sugeno measure space is introduced. Finally, the bounds on the rate of uniform convergence of a learning process based on fuzzy random samples in Sugeno measure space are constructed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".