MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150057261 · doi:10.1016/j.jped.2013.12.002

Vitamin D as a modifiable risk factor in critical illness: questions and answers provided by observational studies

2013· letter· en· W2150057261 on OpenAlexaff
James Dayre McNally

Bibliographic record

VenueJornal de Pediatria · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVitamin D and neurologyDiseaseEpidemiologyvitamin D deficiencyObservational studyImmune systemPneumoniaVitaminDiabetes mellitusRicketsBronchiolitisIntensive care medicinePhysiologyImmunologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitamin D is essential to optimal health. Studies dating back to the early 1900’s convincingly demonstrate that a state of vitamin D deficiency, acquired through limited sun exposure and avoidance of vitamin D-rich foods can lead to stunted growth, bone disease, and hypocalcemic seizures. Over the past few decades, a rising body of epidemiological literature has also suggested that vitamin D deficiency predisposes to a wide variety of disease states outside of the musculoskeletal system. For example, vitamin D status has been associated with diseases involving dysregulation of the immune (type I diabetes, cancer), cardiovascular (heart failure, cardiomyopathy), and respiratory systems (bronchiolitis, pneumonia). Strong biological plausibility supporting these epidemiological findings has been provided, including basic science studies showing the presence of vitamin D receptors on a large number of diverse cell types (e.g. white blood cells, myocytes), and animal studies demonstrating disease occurrence in genetically(vitamin D

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJornal de PediatriaSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207