Enforced adenoviral vector-mediated expression of HOXB4 in human umbilical cord blood cd34+ cells promotes myeloid differentiation but not proliferation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retroviral overexpression of the transcription factor HOXB4 results in a rapid increase in proliferation of murine hematopoietic stem cells both in vivo and in vitro. Therefore, we asked whether transient overexpression of HOXB4 would increase proliferation of human primitive hematopoietic progenitors. Transient overexpression of HOXB4 was generated in umbilical cord blood (CB) CD34(+) cells by a recombinant adenovirus (AdHOXB4) expressing HOXB4 together with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). Transduced, GFP(+) cells were cultured in serum-free medium containing cytokines that primarily support the growth of primitive hematopoietic progenitors. In contrast to previous findings using retroviral overexpression of HOXB4, we did not observe any increase in proliferation of primitive progenitors or increased colony formation of clonogenic progenitors, including progenitor progeny from long-term culture-initiating cells following adenoviral vector overexpression of HOXB4 in CB CD34(+) cells. However, enforced expression of HOXB4 by the adenoviral vector significantly increased myeloid differentiation of primitive hematopoietic progenitors. Since retroviral vectors generate low and continuous levels of transgene expression in contrast to the high, transient levels generated by the adenoviral vector, our findings suggest that the high levels of HOXB4 expression generated by AdHOXB4 in human CB CD34(+) cells direct the cells toward a myeloid differentiation program rather than increased proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".