MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150104257 · doi:10.1086/432563

Linking Spatial Processes to Life‐History Evolution of Insect Parasitoids

2005· article· en· W2150104257 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas S. Hoffmeister, Bernard D. Roitberg, L.E.M. Vet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Naturalist · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersWageningen University and ResearchSimon Fraser UniversityKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
KeywordsBiologyEcologyHerbivoreParasitoidInsectLife history theoryLife historyEvolutionary ecologyPopulationHost (biology)Evolutionary biologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the evolutionary transition from solitary to group living in animals is a profound challenge to evolutionary ecologists. A special case is found in insect parasitoids, where a tolerant gregarious larval lifestyle evolved from an intolerant solitary ancestor. The conditions for this transition are generally considered to be very stringent. Recent studies have aimed to identify conditions that facilitate the spread of a gregarious mutant. However, until now, ecological factors have not been included. Host distributions and life-history trade-offs affect the distribution of parasitoids in space and thus should determine the evolution of gregariousness. We add to current theory by using deterministic models to analyze the role of these ecological factors in the evolution of gregariousness. Our results show that gregariousness is facilitated through inversely density-dependent patch exploitation. In contrast, host density dependence in parasitoid distribution and patch exploitation impedes gregariousness. Numerical solutions show that an aggressive gregarious form can more easily invade a solitary population than can a tolerant form. Solitary forms can more easily invade a gregarious, tolerant population than vice versa. We discuss our results in light of exploitation of multitrophic chemical cues by searching parasitoids and aggregative and defensive behavior in herbivorous hosts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American NaturalistSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207