Quantitative Proteomics Reveals That Only a Subset of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Contributes to the Phagosome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phagosomes, by killing and degrading pathogens for antigen presentation, are organelles implicated in key aspects of innate and adaptive immunity. Although it has been well established that phagosomes consist of membranes from the plasma membrane, endosomes, and lysosomes, the notion that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane could play an important role in the formation of the phagosome is debated. However, a method to accurately estimate the contribution of potential source organelles and contaminants to the phagosome proteome has been lacking. Herein, we have developed a proteomic approach for objectively quantifying the contribution of various organelles to the early and late phagosomes by comparing these fractions to their total membrane and postnuclear supernatant of origin in the J774A.1 murine macrophage cell line. Using quantitative label-free mass spectrometry, the abundance of peptides corresponding to hundreds of proteins was estimated and attributed to one of five organelles (e.g. plasma membrane, endosomes/lysosomes, ER, Golgi, and mitochondria). These data in combination with a stable isotope labeling in cell culture method designed to detect potential contaminant sources revealed that the ER is part of the phagosomal membrane and contributes ∼20% of the early phagosome proteome. In addition, only a subset of ER proteins is recruited to the phagosome, suggesting that a specific subdomain(s) of the ER might be involved in phagocytosis. Western blotting and immunofluorescence substantially validated this conclusion; we were able to demonstrate that the fraction of the ER in which the ER marker GFP-KDEL accumulates is excluded from the phagosomes, whereas that containing the mVenus-Syntaxin 18 is recruited. These results highlight promising new avenues for the description of the pathogenic mechanisms used by Leishmania, Brucella, and Legionella spp., which thrive in ER-rich phagosomes. Phagosomes, by killing and degrading pathogens for antigen presentation, are organelles implicated in key aspects of innate and adaptive immunity. Although it has been well established that phagosomes consist of membranes from the plasma membrane, endosomes, and lysosomes, the notion that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane could play an important role in the formation of the phagosome is debated. However, a method to accurately estimate the contribution of potential source organelles and contaminants to the phagosome proteome has been lacking. Herein, we have developed a proteomic approach for objectively quantifying the contribution of various organelles to the early and late phagosomes by comparing these fractions to their total membrane and postnuclear supernatant of origin in the J774A.1 murine macrophage cell line. Using quantitative label-free mass spectrometry, the abundance of peptides corresponding to hundreds of proteins was estimated and attributed to one of five organelles (e.g. plasma membrane, endosomes/lysosomes, ER, Golgi, and mitochondria). These data in combination with a stable isotope labeling in cell culture method designed to detect potential contaminant sources revealed that the ER is part of the phagosomal membrane and contributes ∼20% of the early phagosome proteome. In addition, only a subset of ER proteins is recruited to the phagosome, suggesting that a specific subdomain(s) of the ER might be involved in phagocytosis. Western blotting and immunofluorescence substantially validated this conclusion; we were able to demonstrate that the fraction of the ER in which the ER marker GFP-KDEL accumulates is excluded from the phagosomes, whereas that containing the mVenus-Syntaxin 18 is recruited. These results highlight promising new avenues for the description of the pathogenic mechanisms used by Leishmania, Brucella, and Legionella spp., which thrive in ER-rich phagosomes. Phagocytosis is the process that enables some cells, particularly professional phagocytes such as macrophage and dendritic cells, to engulf large particles (>0.5 μm). It can be triggered both by opsonin (e.g. Fc gamma Receptor II/III and Complement Receptor 3) and some pathogen-associated molecular pattern receptors (e.g. dectin-1). The organelle that is formed around the internalized particle is called a phagosome. One of its core functions is to link the destruction of pathogens with the processing of pathogen-derived antigens for presentation on major histocompatibility molecules class I and II to initiate an adaptive immune response. The phagosome being highly dynamic in nature, the description of the discrete steps toward maturation into phagolysosome is still actively pursued. The notion inferred from the pioneering work of Elie Metchnikoff that phagosomes are made by the invagination of the cell surface has been extended in the last decade. Indeed, multiple endomembrane pools are now thought to be harnessed during phagosome formation and maturation (1Jutras I. Desjardins M. Phagocytosis: At the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 511-527Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar). Briefly, activation of phagocytic receptors the of the which the plasma membrane used antigen cell membrane isotope labeling in cell particle used antigen cell membrane isotope labeling in cell particle to the the an important fraction of the phagosome membrane method for the of plasma membrane of Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). fractions of the are in the of PubMed Scopus Google is that of various are recruited to the phagosomes. Indeed, it was that are able to the phagocytic the of the of of phagosome Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of late by was to be for Fc and I. is for of particles in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These of of are in with the of the of cell surface that is during is for PubMed Scopus Google with particle during in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The maturation of the phagosome is by with early endosomes, late endosomes, and (1Jutras I. Desjardins M. Phagocytosis: At the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 511-527Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google M. of a of with the Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These are triggered by a from to as for M. as a of from early to late 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). plasma membrane early antigen endoplasmic reticulum cell membrane postnuclear supernatant stable isotope labeling in cell culture particle total membrane Western plasma membrane early antigen endoplasmic reticulum cell membrane postnuclear supernatant stable isotope labeling in cell culture particle total membrane Western that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) might to phagosome as well Desjardins M. The phagosome into phagosome Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In we of ER to phagosome by and Desjardins M. is a of into PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the ER and phagosomes to the that this process might the presentation of antigens on major histocompatibility class I a to as antigen in macrophage and dendritic M. Desjardins M. are organelles for antigen PubMed Scopus Google M. an class I in dendritic PubMed Scopus Google phagosomes in dendritic a for presentation of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In addition, phagosomes from were to an of ER proteins implicated in (e.g. and and to a toward M. M. Desjardins M. The phagosomal proteome in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). a on large on phagosomes from various has that the of the ER to phagosomes as early as in is to have to this antigen in an immune M. Desjardins M. of the of Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). ER receptors and have been implicated in of endoplasmic reticulum membrane for in 2005; PubMed Scopus Google M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google I. is a of in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These proteins have been to a with and and are for their in from the to the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google M. a that functions in the endoplasmic and Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). However, and M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google used ER such as GFP-KDEL and in to that the was the source of phagosome membrane, whereas the contribution of ER, was The contribution of the various organelles to the phagosome is still Herein, we developed a large approach to the contribution to the phagosome proteome of proteins to five this approach the contribution of the cell membrane and that only a subset of the ER contributes to phagosome we demonstrate that GFP-KDEL is in the fraction of the ER to in with ER J774A.1 and macrophage cell were in containing with and J774A.1 and and were in the M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and the stable cell were a from were from J774A.1 by on as M. of Biol. PubMed Google Scholar). of were used and were in with and of the were from and were with and formed by of for and for were to supernatant and total membrane fractions were for the and of the cell fractions were in of of proteins were with by and on a The was and the were into an The were by and peptides were with The were and in for mass were as in M. M. Desjardins M. The phagosomal proteome in PubMed Scopus Google The peptides were on a with a of was by a of in on an a of The was to an mass and were in an The mass was in a with a a of by of the a of in the part of the of was the and The data was into and with the the and containing as one as a and and and and as and were to and the of of the peptides with a were were used for and the of the of the in a of on the data were into the a of to one were and of and were with to were on proteins by and were by the and of the was a were with their of and their were in a was attributed to one the was this plasma membrane, endoplasmic Golgi, and of and were to their in of and of ER proteins on the phagosome, of phagosome and phagosome were The of these proteins were from of was on that five the a the of organelle contribution to phagosomes the quantitative label-free we made the the of the of the peptides of a is a of its abundance of proteins by of PubMed Scopus Google and the of proteins a estimate of the contribution to the phagosome of their source we the of the of the peptides for from the on the phagosome were in the of the contribution of their these of the this was and results with proteins with some organelles are in of proteins the from proteins for the to proteins for the organelle the of proteins to of the on as to this the of of ER, and were to to the contribution of source organelle to the phagosome proteome. were for the contribution of organelle to the total membrane were in and to for The were with and with the of with and cell were as were and in with and with and on an on a a from to peptides were and on an a the from the of the of were a and by in the of and an activation of was by a of of and of mass was used and to for of data was and the in proteins with peptides an of was from of for proteins and proteins to proteins to the plasma membrane, proteins to the endoplasmic proteins to and proteins to cell fractions of and and were from J774A.1 to the Western the were on a on the data to various in the ER membrane, were by the membrane of from early antigen and particle particle from and M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google and and and and were used with the The of was from the by One The of the from and was and a was J774A.1 were on with and to for in their the was and with with containing to The were to to for was from the and by was to for in with The were with the and with and one of and were revealed and and by the and from were revealed and were from The were a The were with on the and The were and with and a and The of GFP-KDEL and to the phagosome was by immunofluorescence the of the and by with and were and a were from stable cell and for the and as an Using the of on the phagosomes of the was the contribution of various organelles in the formation of phagosomes, we a large and on the that the contribution of the source organelles to the phagosome can be quantitative label-free The of approach was the a from J774A.1 and that phagosome and the fractions from the corresponding the of mass approach to phagosomes we the of phagosomes a and for and The data for the peptides corresponding to peptides and peptides were for in this were in of a The the of and was proteins and The proteins were the from the to the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google and of as well as were attributed to ER, and the were for these organelles the potential membrane of proteins were in the as a potential I and and in a new we used the as a we a of proteins that and for organelles that organelles are in the which is in the this was and the of The of the abundance of the proteins to the five potential organelles in the phagosome the that proteins from organelles were in the phagosome whereas were and were for early and phagosomes and with an in the that was for and as of the proteins to were on phagosome fractions and to the of the and the proteins from and are in the of the on the of the proteins from both the and the ER a with a of the proteins being whereas are to the of the are and the that only a subset of these organelles might to the phagosome proteome. the in the of the Golgi, proteins a that is to the and whereas the major of ER proteins in the of the these we to a of the of ER proteins that data from to estimate the contribution of organelle to the phagosome proteome. of the abundance of proteins in phagosomes and the proteins from of the potential organelle that are on phagosomes from this organelle with the and the we specific from the ER and that are (e.g. ER ER, and and (e.g. I and II and ER suggesting the of specific ER and functions to the phagosome. the of the ER to phagosomes, we a of ER proteins in and phagosome fractions on the and These to highlight ER proteins in the fraction and on proteins on phagosomes, a with the and five highly proteins the we with and from the for of these and their the and were highly in and of ER proteins on the phagosome. In the was attributed to proteins in of ER proteins on the phagosome. Although the of the was by the the the that some of the of phagosomes could from the specific contribution of a subset of the we used a label-free approach to the abundance of proteins to of these organelles to their contribution to phagosome we the abundance of in fractions by the abundance of the peptides of proteins by of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The were used to the of source organelle in a was by the of the of from proteins to a organelle to that of proteins in fraction The that proteins of the ER, and proteins and of the the these organelles and for the These some of phagosome maturation by organelle by Western such as the of and the of and proteins during phagosome maturation in I. Desjardins M. Phagocytosis: At the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 511-527Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google ER were to Desjardins M. is a of into PubMed Scopus Google M. Desjardins M. are organelles for antigen PubMed Scopus Google M. an class I in dendritic PubMed Scopus Google phagosomes in dendritic a for presentation of PubMed Scopus Google M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the proteins to only to the phagosome proteome. results that the of the ER on the phagosome is the ER is in the is an for the for of the ER in with the and and It is that a of the ER contribution to the fraction in from the specific subset of ER proteins that to the phagosome proteome. ER proteins ∼20% of the early phagosome proteome It has been that phagosomes by in a could be by such as proteins M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). we have that the of contaminants is with organelle labeling Desjardins M. is a of into PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). we made of a to proteins and their organelle of we to in for and these to cell with the of in with and In this we that proteins a of whereas proteins to the phagosome a phagosomes were in and their peptides were on an and the M. into the PubMed Scopus Google in of proteins with peptides a of to we from and could proteins to proteins to the membrane, proteins to the endoplasmic proteins to Golgi, proteins to and proteins to and The data that proteins of and of a of that these proteins are in which are to the phagosomes during of the endoplasmic reticulum of of as well as and plasma membrane proteins of and of from these that proteins from these organelles are to the phagosome. the label-free were on of phagosome and of ER were to proteins with various proteins of by (e.g. and maturation was the early and late and as well as with proteins to be the such as and the from the by a with the from the label-free data and large by the ER proteins were to be on proteins on the phagosome and In and were from phagosome fractions and and the data by and we a cell method to phagosome The of phagosomes that the phagosomes and particularly a (e.g. is on this is the of and as phagosomes we used immunofluorescence to ER proteins with phagosomes. The of the proteins was with the of ER In addition, with was used to early phagosomes. The labeling for both and with that of the cell as well as in the phagosome In an involved in a ER labeling that only with Indeed, to the cell is in the this was in the phagosome the and data These were by the for these and on It is that the of the and is of ER (e.g. and and of and (e.g. and these data the that the ER is made of in which proteins are and that a subset of the ER with phagosomes. to the ER and a are ER In this marker was to be recruited to phagosomes M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). GFP-KDEL is a marker to highlight the of the ER involved in we its with by immunofluorescence on the GFP-KDEL stable cell used in M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in and GFP-KDEL only for GFP-KDEL was in the of the ER and was the cell was The formation of phagosomes in these to the of GFP-KDEL as M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). an ER marker used to the of this organelle M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google was in the of phagosomes, as well as the cell that GFP-KDEL was recruited to phagosomes, in with the marker and The of organelles with the cell fraction from which are is a method in cell and Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google M. I. The is with early PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). However, only a of is by the to a of the of a organelle its this by the of the of hundreds of various used a label-free approach to the contribution of various membranes to the phagosome by comparing the abundance of proteins in fractions (e.g. phagosomes, and we a abundance on the of the peptides for an approach that was used for in of proteins by of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). this approach to proteins of we could estimate the contribution of the ER, Golgi, and to the phagosome and Although approach that proteins a estimate of the abundance of the membrane we that it to with the membrane of the phagosome. we used from the well this approach is and used hundreds of proteins to the origin of the phagosome proteome. approach by the abundance and membrane of the from which the fraction is Indeed, proteins to specific organelles the abundance in the with the Although and proteins were in a of on the phagosome, that the membranes of these organelles to the formation of phagosomes, data that only a of and ER proteins contributes to the phagosomal that this from the of these organelles in as for the results that the ER contributes ∼20% of the proteome. is the contribution of which are the of a of from with phagosomes of organelle in the an for and The dynamic phagosomal proteome and the contribution of the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google estimated that the ER to the phagosome proteome. Although the with is by the that their and the mass data were are that could the the One such is that the in both are that of the in the total is recruited to the phagosome, whereas we that the of the proteome that a of the contribution of the organelles that can as a potential source of membrane to the phagosome whereas the is highly on the of that could to the of the ER contribution is the of phagosomal proteins proteins used by in In addition, their of the contribution of the ER to the phagosome on the quantitative data of only five ER and and data that these proteins are in that proteins that their abundance is and for these five proteins to estimate the ER contribution might into the of the In the we ER proteins in phagosome on the phagosome fraction I and for the of their abundance and in with it is to that the phagosome membrane is to the proteome contribution of In the might for the membrane The contribution of the ER to the phagosomal membrane has been a of and it was that the ER could be a contaminant of the phagosome method M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Desjardins M. Biol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Herein, we have the results of a approach in which we in that formed phagosomes with of that were in to contaminants during phagosome proteins and which are in in of phagosomes, are a to is of the the of cell phagosomes and their potential contaminants with their However, ER proteins with an of of from the proteins of and of and the notion that ER proteins are an part of the phagosome. is we the of a of well phagosomal such as and which are in a as ER such as of of and of the label-free and quantitative data the of the of the ER to the phagosomes established in Desjardins M. is a of into PubMed Scopus Google a of the contribution of the ER and the organelles to the phagosome proteome. quantitative data the of ER to the phagosome. The of ER in this and by Desjardins M. is a of into PubMed Scopus Google M. an class I in dendritic PubMed Scopus Google phagosomes in dendritic a for presentation of PubMed Scopus Google M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google as well as immunofluorescence and and a specific ER to the early phagosomes. In addition, a of ER in the of maturation is with the of phagosome data that a is particularly on early phagosome and that this is the of the and as phagosome ER is an early in phagosome that is a of the phagosomes and ER proteins to the phagosomes are during phagosome we used an the of in these the of ER membrane from the phagosome the by which the ER proteins are to the phagosome and is still ER to the phagosome, a on ER and with of endoplasmic reticulum membrane for in 2005; PubMed Scopus Google M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google I. is a of in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google I. M. phagosomal maturation and antigen by dendritic PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In I. M. phagosomal maturation and antigen by dendritic PubMed Scopus Google was to be for be to the of ER in and of the phagosome. from the ER of this organelle of the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google it has been by that the ER is in M. of 18 in the of endoplasmic reticulum Cell PubMed Scopus Google M. of the endoplasmic reticulum a for Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google M. M. the and of the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google One by Cell Biol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google M. reticulum in Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). that only a subset of the ER with the phagosome. of the on ER we were able to the with the phagosome. we have that is recruited to the phagosome, whereas GFP-KDEL is M. I. of an endoplasmic reticulum in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is a the that can be from these is that the GFP-KDEL is a marker with ER such as In addition, we functions that were the ER proteins on the and these proteins were and that were on phagosomes from and Desjardins M. The phagosome into phagosome Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Desjardins M. is a of into PubMed Scopus Google M. an class I in dendritic PubMed Scopus Google phagosomes in dendritic a for presentation of PubMed Scopus Google M. Desjardins M. of the of Biol. PubMed Scopus Google M. and in the endoplasmic reticulum are important for PubMed Scopus Google M. of phagosome maturation and for the role of a during PubMed Scopus Google I. Desjardins M. of the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). from these which a role in PubMed Scopus Google of an with Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google we the proteins and its which has been to be in the ER by of M. an and of Cell Biol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google is a for Biol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google is a that and from the to the plasma 2005; PubMed Scopus Google M. is an of the PubMed Scopus Google in on the phagosome was to to the ER M. M. the and of the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google a of the ER in the of the In addition, of by and ER by and and in was to of role for in phagocytes for cell and the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). that the fraction of the ER harnessed by the phagosome might a of It is that this of the ER could the important for phagocytic formation and phagosome functions in The role of in Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). results that is one of the attributed to ER proteins with the phagosome and the early of the ER that we have are in with this GFP-KDEL was to be excluded from ER M. M. the and of the endoplasmic PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). GFP-KDEL as a marker of the ER might be this we that the of GFP-KDEL to the phagosome, by M. M. I. and dynamic of the contribution of the ER to phagosome 2005; PubMed Scopus Google and be to the contribution of the ER to phagosome we that these results the notion that only a subset of the ER, which could one of its contributes to the phagosome proteome. However, specific have to be to the role of specific ER ER, in phagosomes and immune such as Brucella, and an ER-rich as their In and Legionella are pathogenic to phagosome maturation to their ER-rich Legionella proteins that membrane PubMed Scopus Google and the for 2005; PubMed Scopus Google in In the Rev. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The of and are in this were to various ER suggesting discrete of to the phagocytic process with the endoplasmic are PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In of we that these pathogens a that is play in the of particles by for ER the of the ER as maturation These an new to the role of the ER during of particles pathogens and the immune response. The data with this be from the the The is for the of and for and for for and and and for and the of the for in and with
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".