MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evidence of an antilisterial factor induced by wounding of iceberg lettuce tissues

2006· article· en· W2150167458 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal Delaquis, A. Wen, P.M.A. Toivonen, Kareen Stanich

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters in Applied Microbiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsListeria monocytogenesLactucaListeriaInoculationBiologyFood scienceMicrobiologyBacteriaHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: To examine the influence of wound-associated reactions in cut iceberg lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) tissues on the fate of Listeria monocytogenes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Aqueous extracts prepared from shredded iceberg lettuce before and after storage in high oxygen permeability film were inoculated with L. monocytogenes. Listeria monocytogenes grew in extracts prepared from fresh lettuce. In contrast, inhibition ranging from arrested growth to a decline in cell viability was observed in extracts prepared from samples stored for 1-3 days. Similar behaviour was evident in lettuce shreds inoculated with 10(5) CFU g(-1)L. monocytogenes immediately after processing or after 3 days in storage. Heat treatment of the cut tissues at 47 degrees C for 3 min before storage diminished the inhibitory effect. CONCLUSIONS: The results provided evidence that an antilisterial factor or factors are released by wounded iceberg lettuce tissues. Antilisterial activity was mitigated by heat treatment of the lettuce. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: This study indicates that intrinsic factors associated with plant metabolism could play a significant role in the ecology of human pathogens in packaged horticultural products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters in Applied MicrobiologySame topicListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyFrench-language works237,207