China’s Challenging the “Ricardo Law” Circle： Is world development inevitably antagonistic or conflictive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
World historical development, especially the development of modern and contemporary globalization, tends to be antagonistic, conflictive and non-harmonious. Its theoretical demonstration is “Ricardo Law” circle, namely the rule that social productivity development and historical progress are at the expense of certain social classes and strata. Western countries after the Second World War have hence changed partly in certain ideas, productivity and specific regulations. Will China be fettered by “Ricardo Law” circle in our transformational socialism and has to apply the antagonistic, conflictive and non-harmonious method to achieve the alienating “development”? This paper analyzes the harmony and conflict thoughts and policies of the western economics represented by “Ricardo Law” in order to probe into our socialist social and economic harmony theory. Key words: Ricardo Law, harmony and conflict thoughts of western economics, Harmonious Society Theory Resume: Le developpement historique du monde, notamment le developpement de la globalisation moderne et contemporaine, tend a s’averer antagoniste, conflictuel et non harmonieux. La demonstration theorique est le cercle de la « loi de Ricardo », a savoir la regle que le developpement de la force productive sociale et le progres social sont aux depens de certaines classes et souches sociales. Apres le Seconde guerre mondiale, les pays occidentaux ont change en partie certaines idees et des regulations specifiques. Est-ce que la Chine sera enchainee par la loi de Ricardo dans notre socialisme transformationnel et aura a appliquer la methode antagoniste, conflictuelle et non harmonieuse pour accomplir le developpement aliene ? Le present article analyse les pensees et politiques d’harmonie et de conflit des pays occidentaux, representees par la loi de Ricardo, dans le but d’explorer la theorie d’harmonie economique et sociale socialiste de notre pays. Mots-Cles: loi de Ricardo, pensees d’harmonie et de conflit des pays occidentaux, theorie de la societe harmonieuse
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".