INTENSITY-DEPENDENT ALTERATION OF MINNOW (PIMEPHALES PROMELAS) BEHAVIOR BY A BRAIN-ENCYSTING TREMATODE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the relationship between the numbers of brain-encysting trematodes (Ornithodiplostomum ptychocheilus) and the magnitude of altered behaviors in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Because cysts develop within a brain region that integrates visual stimuli with motor response. we evaluated the standard optomotor response (OMR). Monitoring this task involved recording the time minnows spent following a spinning drum, on which alternating black and white stripes had been painted. Minnows were exposed to 0, 5, 20, 120, and 300 cercariae and then their OMR was evaluated at 2-wk postinfection. Surprisingly, only minnows that had high numbers of parasites (155 +/- 31 worms/fish) or low numbers of parasites (3 +/- 3 worms/ fish) differed significantly in their optomotor performance compared with controls. Reduced OMR of heavily infected minnows was positively correlated with reduction in minnow activity. In contrast, reduced OMR in lightly infected minnows was independent of host activity and was likely associated with the rapid development of parasite larvae within the optic tecta. The nonlinear relationship between parasite intensity and effect on host behavior was consistent with an earlier study, but the underlying mechanisms producing this pattern are unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".