MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150251947 · doi:10.1071/en07023

Atmospheric variation of nitrous acid at different sites in Europe

2007· article· en· W2150251947 on OpenAlexaff
K. Acker, Detlev Möller

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrous acidDaytimeChemistryTroposphereOzoneContext (archaeology)Mixing ratioPhotodissociationTrace gasAtmospheric sciencesAtmospheric chemistryEnvironmental chemistryPhotochemistryEnvironmental scienceInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental context. Nitrous acid (HNO2) is an important source of the hydroxyl radical (OH•), the most important daytime oxidising species that contributes to the formation of ozone as well as of other secondary pollutants in the troposphere. Understanding the sources and sinks of HNO2 is of crucial interest for accurately modelling the chemical composition of the troposphere and predicting future trace gas concentrations. Abstract. Nitrous acid and several other atmospheric components and variables were continuously measured during complex field experiments at seven different suburban and rural sites in Europe. HNO2 is mainly formed by heterogeneous processes and is often accumulated in the nighttime boundary layer. Our results confirm that the photolysis of HNO2 is an important source of the hydroxyl radical, not only in the early morning hours but also throughout the entire day, and is often comparable with the contribution of ozone and formaldehyde photolysis. At all research sites unexpectedly high HNO2 mixing ratios were observed during the daytime (up to several hundred ppt, or pmol mol–1). Moreover, surprisingly, the HNO2 mixing ratio at the three mountain sites often showed a broad maximum or several distinct peaks at midday and lower mixing ratios during the night. Assuming a quickly established photo-equilibrium between the known significant gas phase reactions, only a few ppt HNO2 should be present around noon. The ratio of known sources to sinks indicates a missing daytime HNO2 source of 160–2600 ppt h–1 to make up the balance. Based on these values and on production mechanisms proposed in the literature we hypothesise that the daytime mixing ratio levels may only be explained by a fast electron transfer onto adsorbed NO2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ChemistrySame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207