Studies on recyclability of polyhydroxybutyrate‐<i>co</i>‐valerate bioplastic: Multiple melt processing and performance evaluations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recyclability of the bioplastic polyhydroxybutyrate‐co‐valerate (PHBV) was studied with multiple melt processing (five cycles), with their performances evaluated. A batch of PHBV was processed with a twin screw extrusion followed by injection molding. This operation was repeated five times and samples were collected from each cycle for characterization. For each cycle, the mechanical properties were characterized with tensile, flexural, and impact testing, along with dynamic mechanical analysis. The results showed that the mechanical properties are maintained for four cycles; but in the fifth cycle, there was slight decrease in the properties. Gel permeation chromatography studies revealed that the molecular weight of the polymer does not decrease drastically; however, a drop was observed after third, fourth, and fifth cycle (8.7% decrease after third cycle, 13.5% decrease after fourth cycle, and 16.6% decrease after fifth cycle). The differential scanning calorimeter showed that the glass transition and melting temperatures did not change upon reprocessing, but the degree of crystallinity was reduced as a consequence of melt processing. The thermal gravimetric analysis showed that the onset value of thermal decomposition decreased very slightly. It was observed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy that the chemical structure of PHBV was maintained without any side chain reaction during processing. Scanning electron microscopy studies from the fractured surfaces of Cycles 1 and 5 confirmed that the uniformity of PHBV surfaces was maintained after five cycles, coinciding with the mechanical tests. The density measurements revealed that there was no change in the density of PHBV. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".